Listonixio Fresh and Exciting

Dorathen Better Late Then Never

ActuallyGlimmer The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

Clarissa Mora The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

TheLittleSongbird 'Tom Brown's School Days', one of the best depictions of schoolboy life in literature, have varied in quality adaptations-wise. The 1940 and 1951 films are solid and the 2005 version is decent but inconsistent.However, the 1971 series is by far the best version, being the one to convey the meaning and richness of the original story the most effectively, the most layered and is the most faithful to the book. For this reviewer, it is the only adaptation that's truly great.Visually, 'Tom Brown's School Days' (1971) is very handsomely mounted but also has a darkness and broodiness that was very well suited. It's beautifully photographed, and it didn't look too grainy to me, and the costumes and sets are evocative of the period and have a sumptuous elegance and austere darkness.It's very thoughtfully scripted and sympathetically directed. The storytelling here actually takes its time without feeling stretched or too long, also not feeling too short or rushed which allows the layered spirit and meaning of the original book to come out properly.The characters are interesting and have a compelling realism. The acting is superb, especially from Iain Cuthbertson as strict but sincere Dr. Arnold and Richard Morant as a contender for the vilest bully character to grace television in Flashman. Anthony Murphy is an appealing and never bland Tom, the character's loneliness, fear and courage very believable. This adaptation also has the best developed and played East in Simon-Fisher Turner.Overall, the best version of 'Tom Brown's School Days' and the only truly great, often outstanding, version on its own terms. 10/10 Bethany Cox

crazyhorseluver_me I think "Tom Brown's School Days" was an excellent movie. It was interesting, the acting was good, and it was clean and only had minor swearing. There may have been a few parts (fighting scenes) that were a bit fake-looking, but good for a 1970s movie. Before I watched it I thought it might be a somewhat boring and a bit cheesy, but you can't judge a movie by it's title! My favorite actors were probably Anthony Murphy and Simon Turner. There may have been a few slow-going parts, but you'll get those in just about every movie, and it didn't make it any less interesting. And by Jove, the British accents were, as usual, simply splendid!

bornilon This version, which showed in the US as a "Masterpiece Theatre" program, is a good deal more true to the original novel than the 1940 Hollywood attempt with Jimmy Lydon. It is also much less full of treacle. Young Anthony Murphy is an open-faced, earnest Tom, and Richard Morant is very convincing as blackguard-in- training Flashman. While it's not up to the cinematic standard of the Gordon Parry film released in 1950 (with John Howard Davies as Tom), this version is well worth a viewing if you're any kind of fan of Hughes' book.