Micitype Pretty Good

Tayloriona Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Anoushka Slater While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

adrian121 I love the original looney tunes. It's just charming and funny. The new looney tunes has mostly lost all the charm. To be fair they have tried to update rather than change everything but it tries to be too clever for its own good. Having all of he characters talk is lazy. Road runner and coyote only spoke by gesture in the originals , now the dialogue is terrible and ruins the nuanced humour of a look or gesture!

camiacono Wabbit is a decent show, not bad but could be a better revival for the looney tunes but could have been worse. The slap-stick is funny, it puts Bugs in some situations that could happen in today's world and Bugs acts like he would. The hate I feel comes from that there aren't any of the other looney tunes like Daffy, porky or Pepe le pew, well that's not entirely true I have seen screen-shots with daffy and Foghorn leghorn made a cameo, There are only two recurring Looney tunes in wabbit that is Yosemite Sam and Wile e coyote (some thing coyote is only with the Road runner but he has done one offs with Bugs in the originals), another thing is that the art looks more average and basic for fans liking. I do agree the art could be better but for show with a simple premise it works just fine. As for the lack of beloved characters that is an actually issue, the show could benefit greatly if Bugs was with other character like in the originals. There are one off villain's that aren't really memorable but they do have the grim reaper with bunny ears who is returns time to time and that's pretty funny. squeaks is a rodent Bugs is friends with he really doesn't have anything special about him but he's okay. Bigfoot isn't really funny but I guess they thought it would be interesting to see Bugs in a situation where he's really struggling to come out on top and one or two are fine. The reason I feel That Bugs is the main focus is because they want a new generation of kids to be familiar with the character which from a marketing stand point make sense and when season 2 comes around the other characters likely will return. As for now it's a funny show to watch once in a while.

pgasael Look, docs, I didn't liked 'The Looney Tunes Show'. Critics hated it SO much because of the absent of cartoon gags, the sitcom format, infrequent slapstick and choppy music. This show is better than TLTS.The production is very good, the brilliant WB Animation executives decided to cancel season 3 of 'The Looney Tunes Show', and come up with something else. They decided to remake the original Bugs Bunny shorts. They chosed 'Wabbit'. You want a better cartoon show that is REALLY better than 'The Looney Tunes Show'? You got it!The show is ENTIRELY nicely maded, because it has a nostalgic feel for kids who like watching the Bugs Bunny cartoons. The plot is nice, and Bugs is also back to live in a rabbit hole rather than a house with his roommate, Daffy Duck. The return of the squash and stretch genre is a must see, and they decided to remove the funny 'anvil gag', witch is pretty sad, but still, the slapstick is very funny to watch. This maded me laugh ALL the time, and sometimes raising me a smile.See?! This is HOW they re-boot the Looney Tunes! Putting them in a sitcom format, not good and a really big middle finger. Thanks, Cartoon Network, for returning our slapstick beat-'em-up comedy duo to TV again. I will HIGHLY recommend it, because there is LOONEY about these TUNES! :-DRESULTS: Animation: 10/10 Slapstick: 9/10 TLTS: 5/10 (It's mediocre to watch! -_-) Character Designs: 7/10 Voices: 10/10 Theme tune: 10/10 Music: 10/10Final results: A-

bbshockwave After the really innovative and very funny The Looney Tunes Show, the Wabbit feels, in both art and writing, like a step back to the nostalgic old Looney Tunes shorts. The show has short, 11-minute long episodes, composed of two 5 minute-long shorts. Bugs is back to living in a rabbit hole, often sharing his home with his friend, the oddly not-speaking Squeaks the Squirrel. In appearance, most of the characters got redesigned - frankly, not for the better. They try to harken back to the old Chuck Jones era, but in effect, look more like the 1990's Chuck Jones era of Tom and Jerry, not as Looney Tunes. Plot-wise, pretty much all the shorts have the same setup - random antagonists is being an annoyance to Bugs, usually without a rhyme or reason, and generally being a major troll. Bugs suffers a bit, then he retaliates using his patented tools like disguises, dynamite, and generally fooling his usually not terribly bright opponents to do harm to themselves - The End.Therein lies the problem - this is the plot of pretty much 90% of the episodes (save for a few special ones like where Bugs has to share his home with an oddly childish-Gossamer-like Bigfoot). Rinse and repeat, and it gets very, very old after the third episode already. Another problem is the nature of the antagonists. While Yosemite Sam (who oddly gained weight) and Wile E. Coyote (now Bugs' snotty know-it-all neighbour) are recurring foes, most of the time the enemies are one-shot and not really interesting characters with very little character development. Often, they feel rather out of place too from the show which is set in the modern world, like oddly cylinder-shaped tiny ninjas, a fox version of Marvel's Black Widow, a polar bear-riding barbarian, or even the Death of Rabbits himself, who has fallen a long way from his truly terrifying appearance in Watership Down. It is odd because even after 13 episodes, there is not sign of other famous Looney Tunes characters - Elmer Fudd, Marvin the Martian, and especially Daffy Duck or Porky Pig. Perhaps they are getting their own shows, but I find that unlikely.Maybe it's just me, but in this day and age... I find the slapstick is no longer enough to entertain. The Wabbit does not fall into trap of Tom and Jerry, where you eventually start to sympathize with poor Tom when Jerry torments him without provocation, Itchy and Scrathy style - here the villains all get what's coming to them - but that doesn't make the experience feel less empty. I am not saying every funny cartoon needs to be Monty Python levels cerebral, but after a truly unique show like the Looney Tunes Show, I cannot say I find this sort of humour a step back, and at best, just average.