Wordiezett So much average

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

Married Baby Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

echomedia-58816 A pile of dog toffee, they got rid of Derek Acora, and that ddodgy get in a fat pinstripe suit, they are the types that put me off paranormal investigations. Its always the same boring topic locations, fxxxng pubs and inns, statley homes, hotels....yawn yawn.. Then its 60mins of infra red camera shots, pebbles being tossed about (by the crew). screaming and shouting..To invoke spirits, you don't start a conversation just like you were asking for a jar of coffee in the corner shop...MH...is a load of cobblers

cooperhmc This is 'must see', turn the lights off viewing on a Monday night here for me in NZ. I admit, seeing is believing with me so do I believe in ghosts? The jury is out but I am open minded enough to believe that there has to be something. Some freaky occurrences when I was younger which I still, to this day cannot explain lead me to believe that, whilst there may not be ghosts per se, there may be spirits or energies that we cannot explain.I have just watched the episode at the Ram Inn where Stuart is physically assaulted by a spirit in the barn after Derek, whilst possessed by the spirit of a Witch, says they should go there. All this is built up to by Karl saying that he senses something is going to happen. If you are really cynical, as I can sometimes be, you could say this was all pretty contrived. But frankly, I don't think Stuart is that good an actor; what he went through freaked me out and I wasn't even there.I do find Derek a wee bit far fetched at times (and who the heck is Sam? - must have missed that somewhere along the way)and he REALLY loves the word residual doesn't he? But if he TRULY does know nothing of the history of the location before he arrives (I am a wee bit sceptical about that too) then his insights are remarkable.What I really do enjoy about this show is the historical aspect. As an ex pat Pom that is one thing I miss about my mother land - the sheer abundance of history and historical sites. I do think when something powerful has happened at a place, it does leave an atmosphere. I was sceptical when my Mother told me that she had felt such a feeling when she visited the Culloden battlefield.....until I visited the place myself. I have never had such a strong feeling as I did there and would love to have gone back at night. If ever spirits walk a place, its there. You can really feel the tragedy, the despair - it's very difficult to put into words. You just have to go there for yourself and experience it.Whether Most Haunted is contrived for dramatic effect, as I am sure is sometimes the case, there are still occurrences and phenomena that occur that cannot be explained. And I think this is something that the show illustrates well. We are arrogant indeed if we think we can explain everything in this world. Tragic, violent or significant effects do leave a residue. How could they not? Visit Culloden. If you are American, visit Gettysburg or Shiloh and I defy you not to feel it.Then go watch Most Haunted again and I am sure you will be a wee bit more open minded. Looks as if we are only in series 3 or 4 here in NZ so I look forward to many more episodes to come.

postmanvendetta It may not be believable- the numerous mediums on the show (especially Derek Acorah) seem to know too much for their own good, but regardless it is a highly entertaining programme- and its high tallying seasons and loyal fan base can pay diffidence for this.It is really hard to tell whether this show is real or not- for while the psychics show overly exaggerated knowledge that one presumes would warrant a high paying government job, I do believe that integrated between the 'i can see dead people' nonsense are some genuinely real elements linking to the paranormal. The parapsychologist and historians aid the show with some much needed respectability, while the vigil teams reaction to some uneasy events not only entertain but made me uneasy alone in my extremely modern home (it was built on an orchid aswel, not an ancient Indian burial ground!).One episode that sums this show up, springs to mind - the 100th episode where the cameraman appears to get deeply scratched by a hostile entity and they hear the eery sound of the piano playing in an empty room- not only is Yvette Feilding's (the presenter)genuine reaction hilarious but at the same time the events (real or not) are in one word- unnerving. The 100th shows main downfall is like I've already said the mediums but I would gladly watch most haunted again...which I have its strangely addictive even the somewhat dry parts are mysteriously enthralling.

Jade-Hassett I actually like this show and find it very compelling to watch. Being Australian, it is kind of a history lesson, shown in an interesting way.I think that the show is credible, as it dosen't go too far. I've watched a show similar that was done here in Australia and it was just stupid. If people believe that it was fake, then wouldn't the producers be making more paranormal activity happen? I also like it, in the way that it balances it up at the end with the right amount of skepticism from the psychologists/ parapsychologist. I do believe that a show like this would work well here in Australia, as it has its own share of ghosts- Port Arthur in Tasmania is a prime example. Being a former Tasmanian, I was told many stories of the ghostly sightings.If people think that show is silly, then don't watch it.