Stometer
Save your money for something good and enjoyable
UnowPriceless
hyped garbage
Pluskylang
Great Film overall
Odelecol
Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.
example123456789
The rules of the modern animated show: 1-cheap flash animation, 2-unlikable characters, 3-annoyingly hysterical actions, 4-crass humor. And even Mickey Mouse, the most charming of all cartoons, the Charlie Chaplin of animation, sold his artistic soul to follow the trend of the worst empty era of cartoons history(2010-).Now, I love absurd shows like Dexter's Lab, Cow & Chicken, Ren & Stimpy, but just like any show after 2010, even this Mickey series tried to copy their modern and "subversive" style. The problem, anyway, is not the act of copying, but the way one does it: this Mickey series is just a carbon copy of that Cartoon Network humor and irony, and adds nothing. Watching this series there's nothing, NOTHING more; and that's why it doesn't even feel genuine in its gags and situations: it's so mechanically based on others already seen style that every time I guess exactly what will happen: the gag, the facial expression.. everything. It's really just a mechanical copy, with no Disney touch(with no touch whatsoever). I remember the old days: nobody had a more perfected and developed identity than Disney and its shows, even when they modernized themselves; but it's clearly not the case anymore. The point is simple: if this show had not characters with the look of Mickey, Goofy, and Donald in it, nobody cared to watch it.PS: Goofy from this series is one of the worst character of cartoon history
twade2
Mickey and friends are back, baby! WHEEEEEEEEE! They are free from the clubhouse prison, more or less. Those shorts I saw on internet and TV are the funniest shorts I've ever seen. Mickey Mouse is back as his mischievous self, but still a good guy. I'm not a fan of Goofy's redesign, but I get they just want him in a Dippy Dog version, but he's still Goofy no matter what he looks like. I don't agree that is like Ren & Stimpy because it's not meant to be like one. Yes, they get edgy sometimes and sometimes a bit gross, but I assure you it's not meant to be like Ren & Stimpy. I promise. Also, who knows, maybe they finally get their half hour TV series. But in the meantime, I will enjoy those shorts and cherish them on Itunes.How do you like them apples, Hannah Montana? HEE HEE HEE!
Tyler Burns
this little TV series or whatever it is, is just down right horrible. it's lame, not even close to funny and just down right stupid, I mean whoever watches and likes this is a loser because it's pretty bad. I think they should just stop playing and airing new ones considering they're not worth the time. I would rather gouge my own eyes out than watch this. it really isn't worth watching and honestly every time I see this on I immediately just want to change the channel. it's not good, it's ridiculous and I don't see what's so great about it. never in my whole life have I hated something like this. UGGGGGGGHHHHH!!!
MartinHafer
One reviewer for this show clearly hated it. They describe it as 'despicable, detestable, deplorable desecration of Walt Disney's early works'. I can certainly understand WHY they felt that way, as the animation style is NOTHING like the classic Disney characters and it seems pretty cheap at first. And, I can certainly understand WHY they felt this way because the characters were doing many things that would make Walt spin in his grave like a rotisserie. Imagine having episodes with a zombie Goofy, Mickey and Donald trying to hide their nudity, dogs urinating, bites being bitten off Mickey's ear and a lot of very un-Disney-like violence!! It IS shocking and I could see how a purist would blanch at such things. However, I am NOT a Disney purist. Sure, I love the old cartoons but will quickly admit that Mickey's old cartoons were awfully sanitized--a bit too sanitized if you ask me. Rarely did Mickey have any sort of edge--that was left to Donald and, sometimes, Goofy. But here, Mickey is a rather impish character--more like you'd see in the very, very early Mickey cartoons and not the sweet and 100% wholesome guy you'd see in the 1930s to today! While the art style takes some getting used to, I can look past the cheap look. More importantly, as I sat and watched these cartoons during a recent Disney cruise (where they pipe them into the rooms), I found myself laughing louder than I ever have before with a cartoon. Imagine blending a bit of "Ren & Stimpy" with Mickey--that is what you'll find in "Mickey Mouse" (2013). I love them and want more!
