Actuakers One of my all time favorites.

GrimPrecise I'll tell you why so serious

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Yvonne Jodi Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

grammatophile Sad to think of how many rapes go unsolved. And it takes a TV show and network to take on police work to test rape kits. Such is the status of justice for women in the world.I'm glad the show exposes the everyday face of the rapist. Yes, rapists are your friendly next door neighbor.I don't understand anyone who would call this show a tearjerker. Personally I think that person needs some help. Why not just turn the show off if you don't like it?I also don't understand critiques of feminist diatribes. Rape is not about a feminist agenda or any agenda. It's about straight up human decency. If you're a Christian like I am, exposing and setting right of injustices is a God filled act.A simple question: why is there a statute of limitations on rape at all? The fact that there are points to the fact of how much people think rape is minor in some way.I would have liked the show to deal with male rapes, which some studies suggest occur as commonly as female rapes.

kmmforever This is one of the WORST crime reality shows I have ever wasted my time on! Spoiler alert: They are NOT professionals at all! They can't even listen to a recording of 911 calls from the victims without not being able to talk until they walk out of the room to cry! Are you kidding me?! Advice: hire MEN who can control their emotions!! You are NOT connected to these victims this is NOT your story you are there to do a job! Spoiler alert: these women who are suppose to be professionals break down in front of the actual victims even when the victims themselves aren't crying! You don't think they haven't shedded their own real tears?!? Possibly for years?! And then I feel connected to this victim because I have a son too or we have the same job or maybe you're connected to the victim because you once drove down the same road! Please if this show hasn't been canceled already do so now! Maybe even take the extra step and burn all copies. Btw I'm a women.

Ignatius P. Freely While Robert W. Anderson's review contains some good points, it is far too harsh.I've watched every episode of "Cold Justice: Sex Crimes" (they are available on YouTube), and quite frankly, I'd like to see more.Good Points1. The show never slips into a feminist diatribe against men. It could to gain a wider audience. Instead, every case is handled professionally.2. The hosts are fine. Yes, they are both former prosecutors. So what? Nothing about the hosts grates on me. Again, they are very professional. (Robert W. Anderson's review prefers the series "Cold Justice". Please tell us, Robert, what is so good about retired detective Johnny Bonds? His interrogation skills are abusive and usually lead nowhere.)3. Each case is unique. Yes, they are all rape cases. However, the victims are different, the cities are different, the settings of the rapes are different. What else would you like to see, Robert? Unsolved child abuse cases? Unsolved teacher boinks student cases? Unsolved man raped by woman cases?The Fundamental Problems1. Every case in "Cold Justice: Sex Crimes" ultimately comes down to "Is there DNA evidence?" In the ten episodes, not one case was solved without DNA.2. It's a sad comment on American society that "Cold Justice: Sex Crimes" actually exists simply because cities cannot afford to send Sexual Assault Evidence (SAE) kits to a forensics lab for processing. Some cities have a 15-year backlog of untested SAE kits. TNT network steps in, pays for a few kits to be processed at the private Sorenson Forensics lab, and cases immediately get solved.

Robert W. Anderson This series fooled me completely. Since it came from the people that are behind the "Cold Justice" show. This show is structured in much the same way as its sister show, "Cold Justice". But in "Cold Justice" the two female hosts have different backgrounds. In "Cold Justice", we have a former prosecutor and a former crime-scene investigator. While this shows hosts are both former prosecutors that specialized in rapes. Where this show goes wrong is. Every show is basically the same. The show opens with the former prosecutors meeting the cops at the next city they've decided to help. After that the routine starts. While every week has a different victim/victims. The investigations are all the same. Every week. The show consists of about 45 minutes of people associated with the case being questioned (and crying - a lot). Then the investigators call the DNA lab and get the results to see if they have a case. If they do get a match. Everybody applauds and cries. If the results are negative everybody is sad. Either way they then move to where they talk to the victim/victims. And that is always another opportunity for the hosts, the cops, and the victims to cry again. I have all the sympathy in the world for these victims. But I don't think this is good television. "Cold Justice" is a great show because the crimes all have differences. And the investigations have a lot of variations. And that's what makes a show like this interesting. With this show. They managed to make a crime investigation show tedious.