Alicia I love this movie so much

Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

vineeth002 I watched the movie last month. It's an excellent movie with suspense and surprise at every moment. The strarring of my favourite actress Susan wards is so amazing (Besides she's beautiful too). The director of the movie needs an equal appreciation. I hope more sequel of wild things will be made.Another thing is its back ground music. The back ground music that is heard in the beginning of the movie and at the end. So pretty......... The ending is also nice. The end reveals how the robbery is planned.. So very bad for those who leave the chair upon seeing the credits. They miss the 'important part'.

disdressed12 this followup to the original Wildthings falls short in a lot of ares.it is nearly a carbon copy of the original plot structure.basically people betraying each other and being betrayed by others.however,there is no originality in this movie.the basic story has been done and much effectively in the original.there are a lot of twists and turns in this one,but they are very predictable,although ridiculous at time.the acting,while decent in the original,is less than decent in this movie.this is unfortunate,because the story itself is not good enough to carry the movie.you may find your eyelids drooping while watching this thing,as it is painfully slow at times.and you're eyes will glaze over and roll back in your head at the absurdity of the plot twists.i believe many of these plot twists were simply added to keep the movie at a certain running time.this movie is a much less than average effort 3* out of 10

drmilo-1 It's almost all been said about this dreck already except one thing. Yes I've found a new complaint for this rubbish! Apparently the people creating this movie have no idea how wealth should look, or they thought their audience would be fooled, or perhaps they thought that everything else in this (Did I mention this movie isn't worth downloading for nothing?) awful flick was so bad nobody would find the time to complain about what I'm going to complain about! Whatever. The limousine the supposedly wealthy girl rides in would have been old in 1990! The, rather small, home she lives in is devoid of decent furniture or art (Oh but it has a plain and cheap looking wine cellar, she must be rich!). The clothes Ms. Ward wears could be obtained easily at Sears.It has been said already that this drivelfest fails to get even the easy stuff right and this is yet another example.Pity I can't give it a 0.

tysonhollen I thought this movie was going to be different than the original one but it seems to be a cheesy B-List copy in almost every way.It contains the same plot as the first Wild Things.The actors and the characters they play look like,act and talk almost identical to the characters in the original.They chose Susan Ward for the Denise Richards spoiled-rich girl role because she looks like Richards.They chose Joe Michael Burke for the Matt Dillion town-respected city worker role because he looks like Dillion and they chose Linden Ashby for the Kevin Bacon obsessed cop role because he looks like Bacon.The only difference between this one and the original is that in this one the rich girl gets the money and the poor girl dies,where a in the first movie the poor girl gets the cash and the rich girl dies.This movie is very predictable after the first fifteen minutes. Calling this piece of trash a great flick is blasphemy.I only rent this one when I can't find anything else to rent. My advice is go and rent the original not this one or wild things 3 either.