Vaayai Moodi Pesavum

2014
6.7| 2h20m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 25 April 2014 Released
Producted By: Y NOT Studios
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

A mysterious illness declared as dumb flu spreads in a quaint hill station forcing the town's residents from speaking. Will the problems in the place increase due to this or will it lead to better communication?

Genre

Comedy, Romance

Watch Online

Vaayai Moodi Pesavum (2014) is now streaming with subscription on Prime Video

Director

Balaji Mohan

Production Companies

Y NOT Studios

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial
Watch Now
Vaayai Moodi Pesavum Videos and Images
View All

Vaayai Moodi Pesavum Audience Reviews

Diagonaldi Very well executed
Listonixio Fresh and Exciting
Frances Chung Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Ak_Rashed A Mind Blowing Masterpiece/ in one word 'sherah' ...Got everything comedy,drama,emotions,sweet Romance ...i would give 10 out of 10 for that Health Minister ...Hes Best ,Hes a legend of comedy ...And of course Delquer Salman Is best as always ....
yunusitboss New movie Reviews and lots more Hot news .... LIKE THIS PAGE : English Hindi TAMIL TELUGU Facebook : Movie Review by Yunus Irshad https://www.facebook.com/YunusIrshadsMovieReviewVaayai Moodi Pesavum (U) TAMIL -------- my Rating: ★★★½ TIME PASSSTRENGTHS :- * Story Screenplay Dialogue Direction: well written new concept to tamil cinema.. * Casting and Performances :were really good. * Robo shankar comedy scenes were hilarious. * BGM: takes completely in second half.WEAKNESSES :- * Songs were not impressive. * Lengthy first halfFINAL VERDICT :- * Overall... it is a great time pass movie you will enjoy. There is a complete surprise in second half ... watch it What if an entire town stopped speaking?Director: Balaji Mohan Writers: Balaji Mohan, Balaji Mohan Stars: Dulquer Salmaan, Nazriya Nazim, Madhoo | See full cast and crew »
Tejas Nair I am going to warn you people about the peril of watching this film, either in Tamil or Malayalam. With no story at all, the plot of this terribly long film drags and manages to stand afoot with one and only one thing: HORSEPLAY.It starts off with characters that are not properly introduced: a happy- go-lucky salesman who is a brilliant communicator, an innocent girl kept on her toes by her strict boyfriend, and some of the worst characters in cinema history: actor and alcohol lovers' fans associations who are in a face off. The narrative is stupid as from thin air, a fictional epidemic strays the city and people start losing their voices. Off-screen, I was starting to lose my temper.Then comes the second half where every single character is seen playing charades, because the city administrators have put up a ban on "talking." The logic behind that is preposterous. This cannot be termed a spoiler alert since there is no plot at all, like I mentioned before. I courageously braved the second half to receive a blown-off climax and a rather clumsy ending. It felt like even the makers had got tired of the nonsense they had voluntarily created. It has many themes, yet even one fails to make a point.Watching Madhoo after a very long time felt good. Nazim is fine and so is Salman. Supporting cast is nothing much to speak about. The film heavily borrows from yesteryear classics, Taare Zameen Par for example.BOTTOM LINE: I had this sinking feeling after watching the film, because I felt like I had lost something out of me and now I know what it was: my logical thinking capability. The 2 stars are for the few chuckles and emotive sequences I enjoyed. Avoid!Can be watched with a typical Indian family? YES
sesht You must've heard of 1-joke movies. Well, this one's a single concept flick. They decided to make something unique, and found a good concept, but other than doing a little with it, they run out of ideas. They do surround the concept with a good team of technical staff and actors, but the one they missed out on was a good helmer. Balaji Mohan, IMHO, is not up to the task, looking at the end result, that is.The good parts? The concept, the satirical take on the whole thing, and a few other extensions, like TaNaKuSa and the fan club, having some fun with the existing tropes in society. Also, ripping of the aspect from Paul Verhoeven's Robocop with having a parallel media narration track works well for this genre, and specifically this flick. Among the performances, everyone gives it their all, but are hampered by the (lack of) characterization, but more on that later. Pandiaraajan, John Vijay, the actor playing the Minister's PA and the head of TaNaKuSa acquit themselves quite admirably, along with 'Roja' Madhoo.The bad? Lazy writing, as evidenced by not writing a single word, smart or otherwise, for the lead, whose strength is supposedly talking his way out of any situation/resolving everything using his gift of gab. Even more ironic, considering he loses his "super-power" for about half of the movie. I, for one, would have liked to see said super-power in play before that event. Its like having Superman's powers wiped out by Kryptonite even before we see him fly or don the cape. Screen writing 101. That was extremely disappointing. Lack of good characterization hampers even a great actress like Nazriya Nazim, who did a fantastic job earlier this year in 'Ohm Shanthi Oshaana', and also in a lesser-work like 'Raja Rani'. I've never seen Dulquer Salmaan act before, and cannot profess similarly about his prowess, but I'm sure that he might have been able to display more range, given the opportunity. The score - given that this movie relies on silence for a major portion of its running time, one would have expected a stronger score. What exists is not bad, but does not elevate the material in any way either. Rajat Kapoor (other than for 'Aankhon Dekhi', which has perhaps some of the strongest scoring to-date) has been accused for focusing more on content rather than technical aspects, but when you think of his works overall, you don't find them wanting due to a weak score. This one needed something better for us to digest the weak content. Alas, that is not to be.To sum it up, one must watch this at the multiplex, just to encourage something 'different', but I sorely wish the makers had not taken their audiences for granted on the other aspects of film-making.