There's Something Wrong with Aunt Diane

2011
6.7| 1h40m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 25 July 2011 Released
Producted By: HBO Documentary Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.hbo.com/documentaries/theres-something-wrong-with-aunt-diane
Info

Filmmaker Liz Garbus investigates the mysterious tragedy of Diane Schuler in an effort to understand what went wrong.

Genre

Documentary

Watch Online

There's Something Wrong with Aunt Diane (2011) is now streaming with subscription on Max

Director

Liz Garbus

Production Companies

HBO Documentary Films

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
There's Something Wrong with Aunt Diane Videos and Images
View All
  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

There's Something Wrong with Aunt Diane Audience Reviews

RipDelight This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.
CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.
InformationRap This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.
Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
spratnicki There is no doubt that there was alcohol and THC in Diane's blood stream, that is FACT. I watched the entire family deny the facts for the entire 'documentary'. What this film failed to explain was HOW Diane was that intoxicated. First off, THC is getting a bad rap here. THC is stored in a persons fat cells. It will remain in your system for anywhere between 1 week and a few months depending on that persons body mass, their personal metabolism and their usage of marijuana. It was revealed that Diane did in fact smoke marijuana. According to the family, she and she alone indulged occasionally. The family was coming home from a weekend camping trip. I'm 99% sure that while on this relaxing trip Diane would have consumed marijuana. There is hardly a better place to indulge. Campfire, marshmallows, the great outdoors...it's a great place to smoke some marijuana and enjoy life. It makes sense that the toxicology report came back positive for marijuana. What is total bullshit is the report saying she smoked 'an hour' to 'four hours' (I think that is what was said) before the accident. There is no way to tell when she consumed the THC. Also, from daily personal experience, marijuana does not make you aggressive, it's calming and relaxing. There is no way that THC is responsible for this accident. Now for the alcohol. I've been blind to alcoholism in the past with some very close friends. When people are true alcoholics, they are addicted and need the alcohol to survive. Diane was a professional and successful business woman and mother. Does anyone know anyone who can perform like Diane did while being sloppy drunk? Nope, it's impossible. This is how alcoholics function. They maintain a constant buzz throughout the day. A little bit here, a little bit there, but a little bit all day long will take it's toll. So here are my questions for the family or for Liz Garbus... -The Absolute Bottle that was found in the car. Was it the same bottle that was in the Schuler's camper over the weekend? Was it full? How much was left in the bottle when Diane got in the car on Sunday? Had the Schuler's been enjoying some vodka drinks over the weekend? I don't know because that was never discussed. It seems that if the Schuler's just 'had a bottle in their camper' it was for drinking. There is nothing wrong with drinking when done in moderation. So, did anyone drink that weekend? Kinda a big question that Liz decided to omit in the film. -Same question about the marijuana. Did anyone else indulge over the weekend? More importantly, did Diane's husband witness her indulge? That would clear up a lot in the toxicology report. The film had a comment about marijuana being a hallucinogen...not true. It's possible for a first time/non regular user to experience some hallucinogenic properties but it is rare. Anyone who regularly uses marijuana will not experience any hallucinations. The big questions are... -Did Diane stop anywhere else before getting to the toll booth on the Tappen Zee bridge? I'm sure there are credit card receipts that show purchases at the McDonalds/Gas station...did she stop anywhere else? There is only so much vodka on can fit in a coffee mug or soda cup...she would have been sipping on while driving, not slamming shots. Therefore she would have needed to stop multiple times to refill her beverage. I also don't see this being the case. She was a responsible woman and held down a high position job while maintaining her family. -When and where would she have smoked marijuana? I find it hard enough to find a 'safe' place to indulge while traveling and I'm by myself. Diane had a van load of children. Did she just leave 5 kids a go have a walkabout and smoke a joint somewhere? I don't see how this is possible either. We will never know what happens until the Schuler family stops the denial. What really happened that weekend at Lake Hunter? How did Diane get onto the Taconic and WHY??? She was heading away from her destination. Even in 2009 we had road cameras and tracking capabilities. What was the time frame from the time that they left the toll booth/placed the phone call/left phone on highway to the time of the accident? Did they stop somewhere between the toll booth and the accident? Is there no DOT footage showing Diane's car en route to the Taconic? Is there something else in the toxicology report that has been omitted? Did she perhaps buy some marijuana at the truck stop that was laced with PCP? That would make sense but just not true. There is a big puzzle piece missing from this story and until the Schuler's open up it will never be known. Diane was indeed impaired, but how, that is the main question. For one to become 'blackout' drunk there needs to be some serious alcohol consumption. I just don't see how she could have consumed that much alcohol in the time frame in question as well as with her surroundings and children. Save yourself 3 hours and watch something else. I say 3 hours because I've spent over an hour writing this review.
msantos1116 My theory on what happened involves the list of medications that they so conveniently glossed over earlier on in the film.It sounded like Diane was talking nonsense and acting very erratically. This is exactly how people get when they take Ambien and still remain awake. She may have mistakenly taken an Ambien pill, thinking it was something else.After she took the Ambien, anything could have happened. It doesn't make sense that she was drinking, but if she were high on Ambien and then started drinking, this would make a lot more sense.Just my theory and I think it's the one that makes the most sense. It is the only think that can explain how erratic her behavior and how nonsensical her speech was. If you are on marijuana or booze, you are still of your right mind...it is just a little distorted. Ambien removes you from reality altogether and if you do not end up passing out, you will be doing and saying things that are out of your control.The drug tests didn't indicate anything because Ambien is in and out of your system so quickly that it would not be detected.
Michael_Elliott There's Something Wrong with Aunt Diane (2011) *** 1/2 (out of 4)Another hard-hitting documentary from HBO takes a look at the tragic case of Diane Shuler, the woman who drove the wrong way down a NY highway and eventually killed herself, her daughter, three nieces as well as three men in the other vehicle. Her family, and especially her widowed husband, believes that the toxicology reports saying she was drunk were incorrect so he tries to use this documentary to clear her name, which doesn't happen. Watching this film you can't help but get angry and sad. Sad because so many innocent lives were lost in what appears to be a drunk driving case at best and at worse perhaps some sort of suicide on the part of Diane. There are several theories given about what happened and it's clear that her husband wants to clear her name but it really does seem as if he's just trying to come up with anything to get over his grief. One really can't blame him for how he feels but at the same time I grew angry at him for coming up with anything to clear his wife. This includes saying the toxicology reports were wrong and he even wants to question a third report that pretty much confirms she was drunk. The film works pretty well as a mystery as one starts to think that something "other" happened to Diane but to me it was pretty obvious she was drunk no matter what else she was feeling. The documentary also interviews the three male victim's families and it's rather heartbreaking to hear them say they were preparing a meal when the three didn't make it home for it. THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH AUNT DIANE isn't a very easy film to watch but it certainly makes you appreciate time with her family because you simply never know when something like this could happen.
Moviegoer19 I eagerly watched "Aunt Diane" because the story has troubled and fascinated me since it happened. As a psychotherapist (LCSW) and writer, I am often attracted to psychological events that are in some way out of the ordinary and involve something highly unexpected. In this case, besides the obvious emotional magnets, the hook is the seemingly straight-laced Super Mom who drives like a demon under the influence of not only alcohol, but pot too, and as a result, kills eight people, including herself. Really tragic, and begging for an explanation.Unfortunately, this documentary doesn't provide it, though it does give some good hints and clues. Watching this film confirmed what I have thought all along: the real criminal in this picture is not the female D. Schuler; rather, it's the male: Daniel. My theory prior to watching this was that Diane left the campground that morning angry. Was she consciously angry that Daniel got to drive off alone,(er,with the family dog) while she got to take the five kids for breakfast and then take the three girls home to her brother and sister-in-law's house? Maybe not, but then, as the documentary shines light on, Diane was bursting with a lot of unrealized and unexpressed anger, starting twenty seven years ago when, at the age of nine, her mother took off, leaving Diane (the only girl) in charge of her brothers and father.As Daniel's mother so aptly described, Diane had more of a third child in Daniel than a husband or partner. Perhaps Diane did what many of us unwittingly do so well: she chose a mate who helped to recreate her role in her original family. It's not wildly improbable to assume that beneath the facade of the happy, in-charge, in-control woman was someone who was seething with unexpressed frustration and anger, which in turn made her prone to psychosomatic problems, such as TMJ, which was alluded to (moving her jaw, pain near the ear) in the film, perhaps headaches, and/or other stress-related pains and bothersome conditions.One of these conditions likely caused her to stop and seek pain killers, and then, given their unavailability, had Diane turn to vodka and pot, to soothe both her physical and psychic pain. I highly doubt that Diane used these extensively on a regular basis, for, as her friends and relatives described, she functioned too well. She did, however, like to have them on hand, for emergencies such as how she felt that morning: incapacitated by both headache and rage.Another clue suggested by the film was when Jay Schuler casually mentions that Daniel never wanted kids. This is a big, red flag, suggesting to me that on all these happy, festive family events, not to mention in the family activities of their daily lives, Daniel was an unwilling participant. Yes, he was present and he did the perfunctory actions, but ultimately, in the end, he went off on his own (emotionally if not literally) leaving Diane with most of the work.The other enlightening thing that Jay Schuler said was when, about three quarters of the way through the film, she is seen throwing up her hands and talking about Daniel, saying, basically, what a pain-in-the-butt he could be, how he only went so far in a process and then essentially said he had had enough, and also, about his insensitivity toward both her and Bryan, his son. Out loud, I said, "Yeah, imagine how Diane must have felt." There are other psychological pieces which could be addressed but in another venue. As part of a film review, however, I think it's fair to say that the film contributed information which, for me, solidified the opinion I have had since that day two years ago: if there is a real villain in this story, it is Daniel. He is the passive aggressive, disturbed child-man who is not interested in the truth coming out about what happened because that would indict him. I think this is one of the reasons, at least, that the Hances declined participation in the film. Besides their own emotional reasons why they didn't want to appear in it, they may also not want to publicly state certain things, though given the legal actions that are currently taking place, I suspect the truth will soon be known.