elvircorhodzic
THE WILD ONE is a film that quite strange and somewhat frightening describes episode from the life of modern youth. Bikers are presented in the wrong way. I think the behavior of individual protagonists in the film befits hooligans. These are two incompatible ways of expression. The term "Rebel Without a Cause" in the very beginning interpreted incorrectly. The reasons and problems certainly exist. Usually it is a rejection and misunderstanding of certain social or traditional norms. Here there are some special rules. Rebels would want to live free, as they pleased. Society such behaviors generally characterized as delinquent, and it is a problem. One odd and cruel film.Of course, engines, impressive costumes, which deviates from the environment and quite dominant leader of the motorcycle gang's big draw for viewers. It is interesting that there are no clear positions in the film. Motorcyclists live in a world of sensations, rejection and defiance while „ordinary" people are constrained and uncertain. In such relationships youthful frustration becomes a cult. Of course, if it only scratches the surface. In fact this is the path to certain failure. Stupid would be talking about the importance and depth of the story. Social drama do not actually exist.Marlon Brando as Johnny Strabler was eerie, violent and superficial character. His appearance and expression is what this movie made special. He stands out from the rest of the gang. Calm and act as he pleases. Lee Marvin as Chino is the complete opposite of the main hero. He is loud, probably a drug addict or completely insane character. The protagonist, who is still defined. He enjoys the freedom and terror. Mary Murphy as Kathie Bleeker is a girl who is dissatisfied with his life and falls in love with something that is incomprehensible to her. However, she felt a certain freedom in the main character and wants to help him in the end.Mr. Brando, gang leaders and young delinquent, dressed in a leather jacket on a motorcycle Triumph Thunderbird 6T. It seems to be enough.In this film there is a little courage and honesty, but in my opinion is not enough.
MissSimonetta
Yeah, The Wild One (1953) is schlock, but it's premium schlock and clearly much too technically competent for the many negative reviews I have seen for it. I tuned into Turner Classic Movies expecting pure camp with only Brando to lend precious little substance, only to be surprised at how moved I was at the conclusion eighty minutes later. Not that I am suggesting this is an unjustly regarded masterwork; like I said, it is schlock and often too cheesy to take seriously. Yet, in spite of the relatively tame action on screen and the cheesy frat boy antics of the bikers, there's still something going on underneath the surface, a palpable sense of frustration and alienation.The Wild One hits on the tyranny of conformity in 1950s America and the way the younger generation fears a life that is painfully ordinary and staid. This is best illustrated in Kathie, who makes it clear that the idea of settling down and then dying in the same boring town is terrifying for her; there's a rebellious, non-conformist streak in her, most obvious when she offers herself to Johnny on the outskirts of the town, and yet this scene also shows she's only willing to go that far if he continues with his rouse of forcing himself on her. She won't break away from the conformity of the town unless a man takes her away from it all. She craves the free life Johnny seems to possess.And yet, even Johnny is a lost soul, who has no clue what he really wants at all. We're given little of his past, aside from the implication that he had an abusive childhood. While in no way the best performance of Brando's career, it is a fine one, one which elevates the film. He utilizes facial expression and body language to communicate all the isolation and adolescent confusion that the schlock dialogue cannot fully deliver. In the end, Johnny is still an enigma, though judging from his final moment with Kathie, he does seem to be more at peace with himself. You really do have to wonder where he'll be going after this, if he's still just going to wander forever. And what of Kathie? Will she ever free herself from that sad little county?These questions lend such a poignancy to the ending, almost making you forget how cheesy everything else was before. But I like the lack of absolute resolution. It gives those star cross'd lovers an afterlife that few B-movie characters enjoy.
ElMaruecan82
"Hey Johnny, what are you rebelling against ? -Whadaaya got ?"This simple exchange sums up the spirit, or lack of , that inhabits the tumultuous heart of Johnny Stabler, the leader of the Black Rebel Motorcycle Club bikers riding like formerly the horsemen of the Apocalypse their Triumphs, or their triumph over a square alienating norm whose only trophy is defiance and suspicion. People see them as hoodlums, they define themselves as rebels … but Johnny gives the perfect answer to the inevitable question. What have you got?Indeed, there's nothing that doesn't invite to rebellion, it's not just being against the norm or the system but not even making a norm out of one's rebellion, the idea is simply to go, to escape from the conditioning and alienating effect of civilization. These guys aren't the baby boomers, they lived the War, they remember its effect on the elder, they inherited an America to rebuild, but the spirit was all lost in the greatest generation's souls. They're part of the rebirth of America and its conquering spirit, but only in the name of motorbikes, bottle of beers and rock'n'roll."The Wild One" directed by Laslo Benedek is the first of a trilogy that can be defined as the "Rebellious Youth of the 50's" followed by "Blackboard Jungle" and the the iconic "Rebel Without a Cause" (a title that could have fitted this one). James Dean's movie dealt with rebellion from an Oedipal point of view, showing the roots of the youth's unease, the absence of a true model to respect. "Blackboard Jungle" was more about the failure of education. But "The Wild One" shows the results without getting through their background, all we see is these kids in their 20's looking for vast landscapes for driving, bars where partying, and towns for terrorizing.And the first two films have one thing in common, they start with the infamous headliners, you know these big words that don't take the viewer's intelligence for granted. Yes, we know the whole rhapsody; this lost youth is revealing of the failure of a system … and let us pray for it will never happen again. Did we need that? I guess it's like the famous Cagney-Robinson movies in the 30's were people weren't used to see gangster playing the lead roles. Well, the 50's had to deal with rebellious minds, no less dangerous, except for the fact that they didn't cause trouble for money, they had no reason whatsoever to act like they did, they did because … well, why not?And the casting of Marlon Brando as the seminal rebellious kid is the film's masterstroke not just because of his iconic look, 2 years before James Dean with the leather jacket, the hat, and the Triumph, one of the most defining images of the 50's, there's more to that, there's Marlon Brando, there's this constant enigma engraved in his face. This is something I sensed in most of the characters he played in the 50's, we never exactly know what he thinks, what he feels, and most of the time, his character gets away with his secret. Johnny Stabler is no exception, he doesn't emerge from the group as a leader but as a natural outcast with one hell of an aura.This is pure Brandonian detachment, and I love it. See how he subtly escapes from the gang as soon as he sees the beautiful Kathie (Mary Murphy), yes, it's obligatory romantic subplot but Brando elevates it to another dimension ever improving HER acting by the miracle of his presence. I suspect the moment she tried to get the capsule of his bottle and he took it away from her, was one of these improvisations he has the secrets. Brando plays everything, he's tough, sensitive, intriguing and fascinating. Ultimately, she despises his gang, but in no way, she can despise him because there is something incredibly attractive in that guy who doesn't enjoy attracting.This is the rebellious attitude, a nihilistic escape in the world and within oneself, without coming back with no one on one's back. Stabler has no connection with the past, he never looks back, if he takes the girl, she's got to go with him, if he doesn't trust the cop, it's because he did before and it cost him a lot. Always moving forward …. Is his motto, although when one of his gang friends is injured by an old man, observing the cute Kathie, he decides to stay. The townspeople try to accommodate with the gang but it's only a matter of time, and beer that the generation gap shows its limits, forcing the local councilman, Mary's meek father, to interfere. But the man is incapable to use his weapon, abandoning all the control to the angry mob lead by a local bully."The Wild One" isn't the subtlest script ever but I admire its straight-forward way to make its point in 80 minutes that feel longer, this is how thrilling it is. There is a bit of wilderness and soft-headedness in all of us, it's all about which button to press. Its primitive, simplistic, but for some reason it works and Brando is mainly the cause, but I wouldn't attribute all the merit to him, there is a stellar performance, from, Lee Marvin as his rival Chino, almost stealing the legend's show and an unrecognizably young Tim Carey as one of the hoodlums.As simple as the film is, it'll be forever renowned for its iconic image of Brando and his indelible quote, enough to put it in the legendary 50's, a must-see definitely, a cult-classic … or the Easy Rider of the 50's… And Marlon Brando was born to be (the) Wild (one).
grantss
An absolute classic. Filled with social messages on freedom, injustice, vigilantism, and wonderful emotional sub-plots, this is cinema at its finest. Setting and dialogue are quite dated by today's standards, but many of the central themes are universal.Marlon Brando puts in a great performance as Johnny, and delivers one of cinema history's greatest lines - "What you rebelling against Johnny?" - 'What you got?!". Amazing to realise that this was only Brando's fifth movie, yet he had been nominated for Oscars in three of his first four roles (in "A Streetcar named Desire", "Viva Zapata" and "Julius Ceasar").Supporting cast are great too: Lee Marvin, Robert Keith and Mary Murphy especially. Mary Murphy is gorgeous as the love interest, and it is surprising that she isn't better known in terms of Hollywood history.A movie for the ages, capturing the genius of Marlon Brando in one of his most iconic roles.
