CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Senteur As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

Aubrey Hackett While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

Kimball Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

MartinHafer David McCullough narrates this early documentary by Ken Burns--before Burns became a PBS celebrity. It's a film about the Shakers--an offshoot of the Quakers that was formed in 1774. The membership was quite large in the 1840s and consisted of, I think, 19 communes spread across the northern and central United States. Members lived very austere lives--devoting their time to hard work and worship--and complete abstinence from sex. Not surprisingly, this lack of sex, ultimately, meant that the group was doomed--as new members could only be recruited from the outside world. When the film was made, less than a dozen Shakers still alive back in 1984. Best internet source indicates there are 3 left in one facility in New England.The look of the film is pure Burns. Lots of vintage photos were used and his use of zooming and moving the camera about made the images seem to come to life. Additionally, a few surviving members were interviewed and even sang. The singing, though in some ways rather sweet, was also a bit hard on the ears. While the film did a great job of showing the history of the Shakers, it did seem incomplete in one way. What the Shakers exactly believed was a bit vague in the film. How their beliefs coincided or diverged from mainstream Christianity never was discussed other than the form of worship. It left me curious to know more. Still, it is a finely crafted film and interesting (provided you are willing to give it a chance). Worth seeing.