Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Konterr Brilliant and touching

Humbersi The first must-see film of the year.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

gridoon2018 Film buffs might want to check out what Warner Oland was doing before his Charlie Chan days, and what Jean Arthur was doing before her Frank Capra days, but others might want to steer clear of "The Mysterious Dr. Fu Manchu": it's stilted, static, uninvolving and overlong. Fu Manchu's deadliest power appears to be his ability to bore his captives to death; he never stops talking and talking and talking and talking. *1/2 out of 4.

JohnHowardReid A Rowland V. Lee production for Paramount Famous Lasky. Presented by Adolph Zukor and Jesse L. Lasky. U.S. release: 10 August 1929. New York opening at the Rialto: 27 July 1929. Length: 7,663 feet. 85 minutes.NOTES: First of the "Fu Manchu" features, this was appropriately adapted from the premier novel in the series in which the hitherto friendly Fu vows revenge on the white devils who accidentally kill his wife in the Boxer Rebellion. It was followed by two Paramount sequels, The Return of Dr Fu Manchu (1930) and Daughter of the Dragon (1931). Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer then took the series over with The Mask of Fu Manchu (1932) in which Warner Oland was replaced by Boris Karloff, and at this point the studio lost interest. Republic revived the character in 1940 with Henry Brandon playing the role in the serial Drums of Fu Manchu. In 1965, Christopher Lee took on The Face of Fu Manchu, followed by The Bride of Fu Manchu, The Vengeance of Fu Manchu, Kiss and Kill, and finally in 1967 The Castle of Fu Manchu. COMMENT: Aside from its distractingly noisy soundtrack, this Fu Manchu is not the creaky curiosity that some critics claim. True, some scenes are statically presented much in the manner of a photographed stage play, but these are counterbalanced by more cinematic sequences of action and spectacle. True, also that "comedian" William Austin (one of the drawbacks of Clarence Badger's 1927 It) is even more painful when he augments his eye-rolling with his prissy voice, but fortunately he is not in the movie all that much. Warner Oland majestically holds center stage, whilst O.P. Heggie and Neil Hamilton provide worthy opponents. Although often unattractively photographed, made up and costumed, Jean Arthur makes an appealing heroine. All in all, this Fu Manchu still has enough zing to frighten all but the most blasé movie fans. Oddly enough, the movie's original advertising poster emphasizes "ALL TALKING" rather than any members of the cast, although four of them illustrated: Neil Hamilton, Claude King, Jean Arthur (a flattering impression-she doesn't look a bit like this in the actual movie), and William Austin. But not Warner Oland!AVAILABLE on DVD through Sinister Cinema. Quality rating: seven out of ten.

orionview Restored Version Available? Or better yet a colorized version? The original book is free on Gutenburg. The film that is shown now is practically unwatchable but the story and the actors are engaging in the film and would make it worthwhile watching in an HD or colorized version. Oland, Hamilton, and Arthur were all engaged in the silent film era and this is their plunge into the talkies. So you have skilled actors with a good story, but the display is wanting. This is the first Fu Manchu film of the talkies era and it was good. However 83 years later the film itself is in tatters. Message me if you have a lead on an A+ quality version of the film and I (and many others) will snap it up quickly.

dbborroughs First of the sound Fu Manchu films stars Warner Oland as the "evil" doctor. Here the plot begins in 1900 during the Boxer Rebellion. Fu is a good and loving doctor respected by all sides of the conflict. When the Boxers are routed by a western army several take refuge in Fu's garden. The soldiers pursue and in the resulting fighting the wife and child of the doctor are slain. He of course vows revenge and sets out to kill the men he feels are responsible. The film jumps ahead to the present (1929) where Fu, aided unwittingly by his Caucasian ward,a young Jean Arthur, stalks London on his path of revenge.Opulent and spectacular early sound film that mostly doesn't seem like most sound films of the period, its not static and frozen, there is movement around the sets. If there is any hint of its origin in the early days of sound its the lack of music cues. Otherwise this is a rip roaring thriller. It has more in common with the murder mysteries of the period rather then the much better known later versions of Sax Rohmer tales with Boris Karloff or Christopher Lee. Here we have shadowy streets in Chinatown and an English manner house perched high on a cliff. Its moody fun stuff.The cast is mostly excellent, with Warner Oland playing Fu as a darker version of his most famous role, Charlie Chan. The real hero here is not so much Nayland Smith, rather it Dr Petrie, son of of one of Fu's Targets. Petrie is played by Neil Hamilton, best known now as Commissioner Gordon on Batman, however this was back at the start of his career when he was an action leading man. It clear why he was a popular actor back in the day. The only weakness is Jean Arthur as Fu's ward. She seems ill at ease and actually quite awkward. One would be hard pressed to realize that she had been on screen in almost 50 movies by the time this film was made. I would like to think its because of the transition to sound, certainly she shows little sign of the wonderful performances she would give in films like You can't Take it With You or Mr Smith Goes to Washington.Over all this is a perfect film for a dark and stormy night.