Scanialara You won't be disappointed!

Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

chamberscory221 Truly a deeply disturbing film, but the first film and third film were D rated; horrible acting torture porn. The second film was well written, and acted. I would love to see more of the main characters acting skills in other roles and films. Whole film was done with 99% no dialogue. Don't throw this one out as just smut; it really is hard to look away and you feel for the actors..: that being said it is probably the 3rd most disturbing film I've ever seen so whatever you do ! Do not watch it if you can't stomach it., it will stick with you for awhile lol

pronins This is a decent film of the shocker/horror, gore-fest genre. It delivers exactly what is promised in the trailer. I personally like it more than the other two films of the trilogy, it seems grittier and darker, in part due to being shot in black and white. The acting for this type of film is actually not bad, better than what I expected it to be. Now what I don't understand are all the negative reviews about this film, mainly accusing it of being extremely gory, violent, disgusting, etc. It seems as if the people who wrote such reviews thought they were going to watch another sequel to Lion King or something... The title alone should be a good indicator, along with the trailer (!) I mean, if you hate gory violent films, then watched the trailer for this film and still decided to go see it, you must have been either drunk or are a masochist. It's like a vegan who goes to a steakhouse and then writes a bad review about it because they eat meat there - what a surprise, right?... But for those who like horror and don't find this sort of material offensive, this is an entertaining, grotesque movie with lots of dark humor. I gave it 7 stars since it's not a great film really but, for what it is, it's fun and, very importantly, not pretentious, like so many horror films nowadays with directors who take themselves way too seriously.

alexandrepdo i can understand why a lot of people didn't like it, but it was supposed to be a trash AND gore movie. it's disgusting, there's no "hero" or someone who you should feel sad about it, unless the people who became a centipede...? will, i don't like to spoil everything, but if you enjoy horror movies like Man Bites Dog, Cannibal Holocaust, etc, it's a movie that you'd certainly will enjoy. it's fu#king gruesome and well done. if you're a fan of Scream movies, don't even try it, you'll be very uncomfortable.

Leofwine_draca I hated the first HUMAN CENTIPEDE film so I had some idea what to expect from this one: a bigger budget, more realistic effects, and even poorer taste. THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE II (FULL SEQUENCE) sees a depraved security guard reenacting the events of the first film in his bid to build a longer and better human centipede.It's gross-out stuff throughout, purely designed to shock and revolt, and it's one of the worst things I've seen ever - and that's the cut UK version too (I have no interest in seeing the full uncut edition). Thankfully the film has been converted into black and white so that the gruesome stuff isn't too gruesome, but it's the ideas and the gross surrealism that makes this so sickening.Although this is a US-financed film, it was shot in England with some terrible actors, not least the lead. But there's no semblance of a script, Tom Six instead just goes out of his way to offend with one bad taste or explicit scene after another. The ending is particularly repulsive, but incredibly a third part of the trilogy still follows.