Solemplex To me, this movie is perfection.

GamerTab That was an excellent one.

Cortechba Overrated

Lucia Ayala It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

bkoganbing With all the comic talent from the British Isles gathered into one film the Peter Cook/Dudley Moore version of The Hound Of The Baskervilles should have come out better than it was. Far from the best of Peter and Dudley, but it wasn't all that bad.Certainly Baker Street purists will be offended, but they're always offended in the least deviation of a Sherlock Holmes story. Then again you would have to change the plot of the story because a man being torn to shreds is hardly a good subject for humor.Knowing the plot of this most well known of Arthur Conan Doyle's stories about Sherlock Holmes the deviations can be plotted like on a road map. Peter Cook is as usual a most detached Sherlock Holmes, but not because he's constantly analyzing. He's got a mother who is constantly urging him into matrimony and not with Dr. Watson. And the man needs a vacation so he goes to Paris to sow a little bit of his version of wild oats.As Holmes fans know, he does dispatch Watson out to Baskerville Hall to lay the ground work while he dons disguise. The time apart from Watson here though introduces the comedy team of Dudley Moore and Kenneth Williams of the Carry On series. Williams made a specialty of playing silly twits and that's exactly how he plays the Baskerville heir who is the object of a fiendish plot to murder him and get his inheritance. I like him here as I do on the Carry On series.I can never give a bad review to a film that has Hugh Griffith who was blessed with those maniacal eyes with which he did so much in film roles. They helped get him an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for his Arab sheik in Ben-Hur. He plays a swamp character on the famous Grimpen Mire.As for the fabled hound from hell. Well let's say he's been ballyhooed quite a bit.This isn't the best work of Cook and Moore, but it's not all that bad.

Charles Herold (cherold) Normally I don't rate movies that I've only watched 15 minutes of, but I'm going to make an exception for this one, because it begins so remarkably badly that it is almost unimaginable that it could redeem itself. Written by and starring Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, who have done many wonderful things, this is such a total misfire that one can only stare in disbelief. The beginning feels very much like a bad burlesque sketch. The "humor" is very broad, with Dudley putting on a moronic accent and Cook playing Holmes with seemingly no clear idea of what his character is or how he wants to approach him. I'm just utterly perplexed that this movie was made, and feel everyone involved should hang their heads in shame.

jglillis-1 I bought this on CD. Big mistake. I should have looked it up on IMDb first. I figured I'd add to my "Holmes" collection. This has nothing to do with Holmes. It has nothing to do with "British humor" either - I think some of Cleese is hilarious and I own everything Sellers has ever done. This is just a pure-and-simple complete waste of time. It's not funny. Whoever was in charge of casting must have been throwing darts at a board loaded with the photos of wannabe comedians. My God! Who is that thing cast as Sir Henry Baskerville? It's not well-acted. The plot is ridiculous. The dialogue is childish and in many cases reeks of non-sequitur. And Sherlock Holmes's MOTHER?!?!?!? Puh-leeze. I've walked out of three movies in my life - the musical version of Lost Horizon, Paint Your Wagon (a MUSICAL starring Lee Marvin, believe it or not), and this thing.

mike robson A wonderful cast are here involved in what must be the lowest point in all their careers.For some reason Dudley Moore plays Dr.Watson as a high voiced Welshman,and Peter Cook gives Holmes a "stage Jewish" accent!Made up of series of draggy sketches,everything but the kitchen sink gets thrown into the pot-including "The Exorcist" and Pete and Dud's "one leg short" sketch;the result is an incoherent mess.Most potentially amusing moments are killed dead by the sloppy approach of Paul Morrissey's direction.No attempt is made to capture the mystery of the original story, and the players shout,mug and flail around among pathetic threadbare sets.According to Harry Thompson's biography of Cook,Pete and Dud were deeply unhappy about Morrissey's approach to the material,and saw they'd got themselves into a disaster.No wonder the off screen audience throw rotten vegetables at Dudley at the end.A truly stupid film. .....that rumbling noise whenever this film is shown is old Sir Arthur spinning in his grave!