Contentar Best movie of this year hands down!

Cooktopi The acting in this movie is really good.

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

meddlecore This is Murnau's 1921 silent horror-mystery in it's full glory. At 5 acts (of varying length) with all the intertitles included, this cut was found intact in a South American archive, and restored by a couple German groups, who re-released it in 2002 with a modern soundtrack.It tells the story of a wealthy family who are hosting a gathering at their castle home on the evening before their annual hunt. A man named Count Oestch has crashed the party, despite the host attempting to stop him. It is believed that he had murdered his own brother in cold blood, so that he alone could inherit their family fortune. And he refuses to leave, despite the fact that he is well aware the widow of his brother will soon be coming. Though incredibly disturbed by this revelation, the lady of the house does manage to convince the re-married widower to stay- seeing as a Priest from Rome, whom is a relative of her deceased husband, will be rolling in the following night.The next morning starts out as a beautiful day, and the group heads out on the hunt. But their fun is interrupted by a terrible storm, and they are driven back inside, where they wait for the Father to show up. All except for Oestch, of course, who heads out into the storm to go hunting by himself. The widower takes this oppourtunity to turn to the Father for comfort, as she feels he is the only one who understands her situation.She recounts her experiences to him in flashbacks. How they fell in love. How she discovered him to be a humble man who wasn't attached to the same aristocratic lifestyle as she was. How this led her to take on a secret lover who would later become her husband. How he wanted to philanthropically donate the family fortune...putting him at odds with his brother. And perhaps how she was privy he was to be murdered? The Father retires to ponder over what has just been revealed to him; while the rest of the group sit down for a great feast, during which they will celebrate and revel about the hunt. Her husband insists he must talk to the Father, though. However, when he tries to call on him, he gets no reply...and they can't get into his room. Now everyone is worried. Where has he gone? When they do, eventually, get into the room...it's empty. Now, not only are they all worried...but they are becoming paranoid as well- barricading their doors and sleeping with their weapons. Although, they can't hide from their nightmares....The next day, many of their visitors awaken ready to leave...terrified. Those who remain have noticed that the widower has become very silent since the disappearance of the Father. They confront Count Oestch about the rumours relating to his past- thinking he may have something to do with Father's disappearance- but he just laughs it off. A second attempt illicits a more aggressive response, which culminates with the widower's husband being, himself, accused of murder. Was the Count being framed this whole time? This seems to be the case, and (as was foreshadowed earlier) it seems that his wife and her new husband were actually the ones responsible for plotting his death. They can no longer hide their guilt. But in a final attempt to save face, the wife of the deceased fingers the Count as the certain killer.The rest of group is trying to figure out what to do...when the Father suddenly returns- immediately confronting the widower. She has a plan, though: to confess to the Priest- so that she can get it off her chest in a way that it will remain confidential. She claims that she had become possessed by evil and became obsessed with witnessing a murder. After telling this to her secret lover (her new husband), she continues, he mistakenly took this literally, and acted on it by going out and brazenly murdering him. She persists with the suggestion that he later confessed this to her, and it was only then that she had become aware of this and overcome by guilt. She even goes as far as saying that they only kept quiet about the whole ordeal because the Count escaped conviction; and married only because they were both bound by guilt. But the Father does not seem to be buying it... Inevitably, she admits everything, but demands the Father remain silent. Unfortunately for her...the tricks on them- as there is a clever twist which results in the fulfilment of an earlier prophecy foretold by the Count.As you may have noticed, each of the above paragraphs corresponds to an act. This is definitely not one of Murnau's best films, but it is a clever little mystery, with a slight horror angle. It starts off slowly, and takes a while to get going, but the end has a nice pace to it. It's very Hollywood, as opposed to cinematic (if you know what I mean), which is a shame. But at least there were some flashbacks and dream sequences thrown in there.5.5 out of 10.

MartinHafer Be advised that this film was released by Alpha Video--a company that ever seems to do any restoration on their films. This is especially problematic for old silent films like this one, as the print is so poor it's almost not worth seeing the film. But, in many cases, there are no other companies releasing that particular video, so you either take it or leave it! As I am a nut about silents, I realized the print would totally suck--so it wasn't any surprise that it did. Sadly, both films on this DVD (this one and "Wolf Blood") were pretty ragged prints and despite the great titles, neither are really horror films. In addition, watching "The Haunted Castle" was a bit more difficult because both the German AND English subtitles appeared on the screen together--this took a bit of time to get used to.The biggest reason I got this DVD was it was directed by the amazing F.W. Murnau--the man responsible just one year later for "Nosferatu" (probably the scariest silent horror film) as well as "The Last Laugh", "Faust" and "Sunrise"--four of the greatest silents ever made. I have already seen about eight of his films (perhaps one or two more) and was excited when it came in the mail. UNFORTUNATELY, this was not among the director's better films and I honestly think most silent film buffs would never suspect this was one of his films if they weren't told it was. That's because the film lacks the style and the skill you'd expect from a great director--let alone Murnau. Now this isn't saying it's a terrible film--it just isn't a particularly distinguished one.The story is about a house guest who arrives and refuses to leave the castle--even though he's thought by many to be a murderer--and the widow is also scheduled to arrive! This is a dumb ploy, as this was a private home--why didn't they just have the police toss him out of the home?! This made no sense at all. Through the course of the film, this accused but acquitted murderer unravels a plan to expose the killer. The last 1/4 of the film is pretty cool--but the first 3/4 is sluggish and archaic--made in a plodding and old fashioned style even for 1921. Overall, nothing particularly distinguished about this film...even if it is a Murnau film. It's probably mostly of interest to film historians and die-hard silent fans like myself.

Michael_Elliott Haunted Castle, The (1921) ** 1/2 (out of 4) An "old dark house" film from director F.W. Murnau about a group of people staying in an (what else?) old dark house. One night the house's owner turns up missing and later in the night his son, who was accused of killing his own brother, shows up. I read somewhere that this is the earliest surviving work from director Murnau but this here doesn't show any of his wonderful visual style that would kick into high gear the following year with Nosferatu. The film, running just under an hour, takes way too time introducing us to the characters and the actual mystery doesn't start until the very end of the movie. There really isn't any visual style either. There's one character that looks like the Karloff character in Whale's The Old Dark House, which makes you think Whale saw this film (especially since the character here leads to a good twist in the story). Another interesting aspect is a scene that uses the hands of Nosferatu to a similar effect that would be seen in the next year's Nosferatu. I had to view an overly dark, 16mm print without a music score.

Nene-2 This very personal movie from Murnau sets the precedent for the author´s most notorious movie: Nosferatu the vampire.Murnau demonstrates his superb command of the camera and the illumination while setting the bases of the expressionism.The suspense distilled in Haunted Castle is well worth a Hitchcock´s movie and the plot is surprisingly complex for a silent.Do make sure that you see it in a winter stormy night