LouHomey
From my favorite movies..
FuzzyTagz
If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.
Nayan Gough
A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.
Juana
what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.
merelyaninnuendo
The Good GirlPitching it up for around 90 minutes; the track is short and the pace is on, resulting onto an entertaining experience but is it satisfying? Well that's a question one will take it to its grave for there is too much going on to digest and accept even if it is barred within logic and genuine reasoning. Miguel Arteta doesn't quite gets the depiction right which leads to the most confused experience ever for on the other hand Mike White's screenplay is fast and gripping. On performance level, there isn't much to complaint from Jennifer Aniston, John C. Reilly and Jake Gyllenhaal but there surely isn't anything inspiring or impressive too. The Good Girl lacks a character development and a better projection of it and due to this the reasoning; no matter how much circumstantial and concrete, the feature just doesn't fit for it doesn't help connecting the audience to them.
Mr Black
It's been a while since I've seen this film. My original copy was actually on VHS, so had to wait to find a DVD. I like this movie from the start to the finish. Great characters all the way through which for me is the best part of the movie. Great acting as well. You can actually feel Justine's (Jennifer Aniston) pain at being stuck in a small town with a lousy job and the feeling that life is going nowhere. Lots of quirky turns in this film as well as the story goes along. Fun story with a lot o reality to it. I think it's one of Jennifer's best, but then I pretty much like everything she's in. Great actress.
maggie-maureen7
About a year and a half ago, around the same time that my love for movies turned into an addiction, I fell in love with IMDb and simultaneously decided that I was going to watch every Jake Gyllenhaal movie made (I happened to love him also). So when I sat down to watch this movie I really had no idea what to expect at all. What I learned over the next 90 minutes was the following: 1. Jake Gyllenhaal is not the focal point in this story 2. Jennifer Aniston can be a hell of a good actress when she applies herself and 3. Sometimes good monologue is not enough to save a film. The Good Girl has all the makings of a good movie. A solid cast, an experienced director, and a gifted writer. Yet something goes awfully wrong in the movie. It aims for a sort of nonchalant humor and while it is at times funny, more often than not it is painfully boring. You might end up walking away wondering 'Why, why did I see that?' Or you might find yourself appreciating the dry bits of humor and Aniston's character's reflections on her life, or lack there of. But the way that I like to examine the viewer value of a film is to ask yourself what you took away from it. And unfortunately, just like in the movie itself, nothing much changed from start to finish except an unsatisfied emptiness that had developed in the pit of my stomach by the time the credits had arrived to say, "It's Over."
dragonfly6160
I am not a huge Jennifer Aniston fan, but she does great work in "The Good Girl." Without a word of dialogue, Ms. Aniston as Justine Last communicates the despair of a woman trapped in a boring marriage, employed at a dead-end job at a Walmart-like store in a nothing small town.For a time, Justine rebels against her life "Of Quiet Desperation" and starts a reckless affair with Jake Gyllenhaal's character Holden Worther.Justine is on the verge of escape,but in the end chooses stability over rebellion, because she is after all "The Good Girl."