FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Listonixio Fresh and Exciting

Gutsycurene Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

Numerootno A story that's too fascinating to pass by...

Ben Larson This film, stars British actor Toby Jones (Captain America: The First Avenger, Snow White and the Huntsman) as Hitchcock. He hires actress Tippi Hedren (Sienna Miller) for his follow-up to Psycho, The Birds.The film about Psycho came out just one month later with Anthony Hopkins as Hitchcock.So, the question naturally arise: with two Hitchcocks in a month, one in theaters and one on HBO, who is the better Hitchcock?One thing is certain. I have lost all respect for the real Alfred Hitchcock. He is an asshole.Hopkins made the better character. Mirren was certainly the better Alma. Miller was fantastic and deserved her BAFTA.Hedren never achieved her stardom.

tomsview Wow! Is that really what happened? In many biographies about Alfred Hitchcock, the most Tippi Hedren ever said about the incident when Alfred Hitchcock supposedly propositioned her was, "Demands were made of me that I could not acquiesce to." But in "The Girl", Toby Jones' Hitchcock puts it right out there when he says to Sienna Miller's Tippi Hedren, "From now on, I want you to make yourself sexually available to me at all times. Whatever I want you to do, whenever I want you to do it." Possibly it happened that way, Tippi Hedren seems to have been consulted by the filmmakers. My feeling is that where there was that much smoke there had to be fire, but just how fair is "The Girl"?The movie is nothing less than interesting. Toby Jones is amazing, and Sienna Miller more than holds her own, but opinion over the film is divided. On one side are those outraged that Hitchcock's reputation has been besmirched without a chance to defend himself, while on the other are those outraged at what Hitchcock appears to have done to Tippi Hedren."The Girl" relates how Alfred Hitchcock groomed the inexperienced Hedren to star in "The Birds" and "Marnie". During the process, Hitchcock changed from mentor to monster becoming totally obsessed with her. Eventually he made an overt sexual advance. She refused and that was the end of the relationship.One scene in "The Girl" does undermine it. It's the somewhat salacious screen test where Hitchcock asks Hedren to give Martin Balsam a long lingering kiss. Unfortunately for the makers of "The Girl", the actual test clip is fairly well known from documentaries and YouTube, and is a lot less threatening than the recreation. In reality, Balsam and Hedren actually seem quite comfortable with each other. It was silly to overdo a scene that is so accessible; it leaves you wondering how much over-egging went on with the rest of the custard.The difference between Hedren and Hitchcock's other leading ladies was that they were better able to handle him. Most were established stars, surrounded by husbands, boyfriends and agents, but Hedren didn't have all that; she was just starting out and was far more vulnerable.According to some sources, it was about this time that Hitchcock's judgement also seemed to be slipping. The suppressed voyeuristic tendencies and fantasies that helped inform his great films were taking on a harder edge. He now wanted to be explicit in what he showed.Up until then, the Motion Picture Production Code kept him in check. Would films like "Rear Window", "Vertigo" or even "Psycho" be the enduring classics they are today if Hitchcock had been allowed to go all the way? The censor made him innovative and subtle. However, by the late 60's the Code was gone. No one ever ranks 1972's "Frenzy" among his greatest movies; plenty of rape and nudity on display there. Fortunately he never made "Kaleidoscope"; with what he had planned, it could have been a real legend killer.As far as "The Girl" is concerned, maybe it's best to just enjoy the show. Toby Jones' Hitchcock is even better than his Truman Capote, genius really, the voice is perfect, and Sienna Miller is so beautiful that you can believe that a fat, old auteur could harbour a fantasy or two about her. But maybe the last words on the subject could be the classic line Hitchcock once directed at an actor who was getting a bit too worked up about things, "Don't worry, it's only a movie".

TheLittleSongbird I knew I wanted to see The Girl as Alfred Hitchcock is my favourite director. It also had a very interesting subject that would have been even more so if done right. But when seeing it around Christmas, I found myself very disappointed overall, of all the programmes aired in the festive season The Girl gets my vote for being the biggest let down. It is not entirely bad though. The costumes and sets do look beautiful, the make up for Hitchcock is really outstanding and those birds are scary(sadly for them the scenes they featured in had no impact otherwise). But the best asset was easily Toby Jones' Hitchcock, an eerily brilliant performance- much much than a impersonation as I feared it would be- that gives an emotional complexity to a role that is written anything but here. Even the voice is spot on. In short, a very good example of a performance that was much better than the film(or TV film in The Girl's case) itself.Unfortunately for Jones, he is the only actor who is good. Imelda Staunton and Penelope Wilton do try hard but are criminally underused in very clichéd roles, while everybody else underacts embarrassingly. And I will say the same for Sienna Miller here too. She looks lovely but aside from that she only seems to be able to act terrified and act wooden. I know that Tippi Hedren is not considered among the best of actresses, I happen to think despite the lack of experience that she was better than given credit for, but Miller looks as though she was told to "look beautiful but don't try to act, other than in the scenes with the birds, as Hedren wasn't a good actress".The acting is not actually the worst thing about The Girl, the script and story were the main culprits. The script is a real clunker, often overwrought, very stilted and worst of all frustratingly one-sided. Here Hedren seems to be the victim sort of character, and throughout the only kind of sympathy shown for Hitchcock is that of self-pity, other than that he is little more than a lewd sadist. Okay I am not denying that Hedren was treated poorly by Hitchcock when filming The Birds, but Hitchcock's treatment of her in The Girl seems to be hysterically overboard here. You are wondering a lot how much truth is there here? The story feels very sluggishly paced, with the reenactment of the iconic telephone box scene tedious instead of frightening, despite the birds, the dream sequences are really hackneyed and the how Hedren was treated by Hitchcock is dealt with in The Girl in a repetitive and very episodic fashion.Julian Jarrold's direction is routine and does nothing to make the story or characters come to life. There is an over-reliance on close-ups, I don't mind close-ups as long as they are not used too much and are not overly-obvious, in both cases with The Girl they were overused and too obvious. We don't care for any of the characters, despite the actors. With Hedren and Hitchcock they are one-sided, that with how Hitchcock is written we cannot identify with him at all and Miller's performance is too bland to make Hedren's plight register with us. The rest of the characters are underwritten clichés, which is a big part of the underacting. I found little memorable about the music as well, only the use of Wagner's Tristan Und Isolde prelude stuck in my head and that's because it is one of my favourites and used quite nicely actually in the film.Overall though, considering the subject matter and the talent The Girl was a severe disappointment. 4/10 Bethany Cox

miss_lady_ice-853-608700 EDIT: I'm reviewing this on its own merit as a drama, not based on whether it is true or not, seeing as this is a film review/discussion site.It's never a good idea to judge biopics on the basis of truth. I have no idea whether Hitchcock was really the sexually repressed obsessive that he is in this film but it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day, it's all about the film and what we get is a well-made heartbreaking story about Hitchcock forming an obsession with his lead actress that mirrors the nature of art.Toby Jones gives a brilliant performance as Alfred Hitchcock. Initially it's played very much as dirty old man Hitchcock but Jones adds many layers in, eventually creating a filmmaker who does not have the luxury of being attractive and despite complete confidence in filmmaking, completely lacks self-confidence. Sexual obsession becomes unrequited love- Tippi represents the physical beauty that Hitchcock will never have.The film does not suggest that Hitchcock's work was bad- far from it. It's an exploration of how a filmmaker gets to be a genius and whether it's worth putting your actress at emotional/physical risk if it gets the right effect. We leave the film thinking that Hitchcock had a great instinct for film.Sienna Miller strikes the right note as Tippi Hedren. The character is not meant to be a great actress. Hitchcock does not choose her on the basis of acting ability but on his ability to mould her into the victim. He constantly tells her to look expressionless. Tippi realises that this is how she has been used but is powerless to do anything.The supporting cast are also great, particularly Imelda Staunton as Hitchcock's long-suffering wife, forced almost to act like a pimp. Cinematography is pretty good for a TV movie.How does this compare to the film Hitchcock? Well, I haven't seen that film but from the looks of the trailer, it's very different- a lighthearted film about the making of Psycho. Hopefully the film has more point than the trailer- does anyone really want to watch a hagiography? Hitchcock didn't make cuddly films about jolly people- he made dark thrillers. So why not have a biopic about him that reflects that? The film weaves in parallels between the backstage action and The Birds and Marnie very nicely.The only dodgy bit is the portrayal of the material as being 'the hidden story'. But if you put that aside, this is a bold and interesting film that's not afraid to be controversial.