ThrillMessage There are better movies of two hours length. I loved the actress'performance.

TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

Plustown A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.

Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Richard G. I found this film to be very informative. It taught me all about Mongolian culture and about Finland's excellent education system. You see, these amazing and majestic people teach their children from a young age how to ride a horse, shoot a bow, throat sing, play the igil, and to have 2,000 children. They also warn them about the dangers of this world, such as houses with a hole in each wall, which I've learned is hazardous when riding a horse because horses can fit through these holes but riders are doomed to collide with the wall just above the hole, causing them to fall from their horses and sustain severe head trauma. The people of Finland are truly focused on creating a future for their children by training them to take over the entire world in 30 years. After watching this film I am ready to become a Mongolian horse archer and conquer the world, starting with Sweden. LONG LIVE DSCHINGHIS KHAN!

nindif I found this documentary to be a good overview of some of the basic points of difference between 'western' education systems and the Finish system. The film is laced throughout with interesting quotes and statistics, but it often feels like those statistics are not followed up within the actual film, but serve rather as another area which requires exploration in greater depth. And this is my main disappointment with the film. The statistics are thought provoking and mostly forgotten in the film; there is a very insular tone to the film, possibly due to the lack in variety of schools visited, people interviewed and issues addressed feeling limited. Each time they spoke to the vocational area of Higher Education they only ever showed the electronics area. They never mentioned how their national curriculum is constructed and what it contains. They introduced two girls in year 8 who were going to illustrate the extra-curricula lives of Finish students, however, showed them playing piano and mentioning they do little homework. What about a greater student sample? This would have been more representative of this area. The film is effective in discussing the training Student teachers must undertake and the level of trust gifted to teachers, however this is offset by the fact they fail to really explore all levels of schooling from preschool, the comprehensive schooling, high school and further education. A good introduction to Finish education and teacher training which leaves you wanting more detail and breadth in its examination.