Redwarmin This movie is the proof that the world is becoming a sick and dumb place

BlazeLime Strong and Moving!

Console best movie i've ever seen.

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

gades_noctem I had contradictory feelings after watching the film. On the one hand, the idea is interesting, characters are attractive, and some narrative tools (e.g., the narrator voice) are refreshing and imaginative. On the other hand, many characters are underdeveloped (e.g., Halle is a key character but we never understand her), the story move forward to fast (How do Halle and Will accept the new ending? How does Miss Sinclair make up with her students?). I liked this film and I recommend it to you if you want a different romantic comedy, but I think it could have been better.

Gordon-11 This film tells the story of an unmarried female teacher who is in trouble after an alumnus playwright goes back to her school for a school play.Julienne Moore often plays challenging characters, and this English teacher is no different. She faces loneliness, shame and embarrassment; yet deep down she is a good person who does teenagers much good. I sympathize with her experience, and I thought she did not deserve such bullying. I liked the ending a lot, although I thought the film could have done without the narration of the voice that tells her what to do and what not to do.The story is told in a comedic manner, hence I enjoyed watching it.

Maynard Handley I found the storyline of this movie appealing (I like works of art that are happy to admit some people enjoy their comfortable routine lives and do not crave "excitement" and "adventure"). Julianne Moore was as gorgeous as always, and portrayed her character's range of experiences well. BUT Two big flaws:The first flaw comes towards the end of the movie. We've built up this fraught and tense situation where Ms Sullivan has burned all her bridges. She returns to school, mocked by the students and tremendously embarrassed. We then basically jump forward three weeks to a totally different social environment where she appears to be once-again respected and integrated into the school. WTF? How did that happen? The answer we get is a complete cop-out. It's hinted that some combination of "grin and bear it" on her part and the awesome ending she wrote for the play did the job, but, seriously, that is not how the world works. Teenagers are freaking monsters, not to forget that she earned (for good reason) the enmity of one of them whom she tried to destroy. That's all not going to go away, and pretending that it does destroys any pretense the movie has to somehow commenting on life.The second flaw is not as serious, but the voice-over in the last few minutes is ham-fisted as all heck. It's totally unnecessary, totally idiotic. Throughout the movie (including commentary about the play) we've been told about nuance, about filling in the blanks, about the audience making inferences, then we get this stupidity!

zuhairvazir Some films unintentionally let you a glimpse of the actors' preference in how the actor has built a unique, almost exquisite sense of his/her on-screen presence, in the minds of you and I. I call it 'the intrigue appeal'. The air of mystery and myth and glamour and starry-eyes and what have you, that these actors carry with them draws the audience in. The actor has worked hard to maintain a subconscious photograph of himself in the movie-goers eye and it is this what intrigues me.Stallone will beat the likeliness out of you, so would Willis but after spilling out the NYPD wit. Schwarzenegger will always be an endoskeleton dressed in leather with a prosthetic arm missing. Similarly Weaver, Streep and Lane have built around them shields, those which are impenetrable on so many different psychological levels. These are but only a handful of great actors who have either made a choice or the choice has made them. Brando had it coming, he gave away too much too much to the audience.'The English Teacher' is a funny and partly intelligent film carried on the lean shoulders of Julianne Moore. 'Boogie Nights (1997)' (adult performer); 'Magnolia (1999)' (addict); 'The Big Lebowski (1998)' (eccentric no inhibitions painter); 'Crazy, Stupid, Love (2011)' (adulteress) and more films have made us conditioned to see Moore do something a little more edgy; perhaps take on a more edgy character, more reckless or maybe something like 'I'm Not There (2007)' where she plays '(a) fictional folk singer named Alice Fabian—described by some critics as a 'Joan Baez-like figure'.This film nails it for Moore as the wonderful, still-voluptuous, sexy and mysterious actress waltzes around the film in confusion and a deliberate unorthodox streak of that sexuality that Moore carries all the way up to a rather distasteful end.Yes, I do not have much to say about the film other than it is damaged in a very organic manner.Even with all the bad taste the film or rather Moore give you a sense of unconventional sensuality and it must be watched to see if you could be any of the main characters in the film. It can drive you crazy. A must watch for Moore and MILF fans.