Cheese Hoven
This is a very odd film. The plot is extremely convoluted: a gang abducts the son of one man (Michael Caine) with no money, in order to obtain diamonds from the government (via Donald Pleasance). Pleasance then refuses the diamonds to Caine (thus proving the gang should have chosen someone with money) who then steals them and travels to France with a James-Bond-esque suitcase. Meanwhile the gang is meticulously trying to implicate Caine in the abduction (for some unclear reason) which involves killing their own female gang member and framing Caine. But when he is captured by the police they help him escape...If this were not convoluted enough, the writers obviously try to lighten the tone of its harrowing subject matter (child abduction and torture) with some comedy moments which seem very misplaced.The whole "implicate Caine" subplot is particularly strange and seems more to inject a bit of lurid sensationalism (nude snaps and dead girl in bed) and to provide an excuse for a poorly executed escape sequence. I'm not even sure why the capture/escape is staged in France apart from the fact that French cops have guns and therefore Caine can be shot at. This brief French excursion unnecessarily causes another poorly staged sequence; his need to get back into England.One also wonders why the girl would allow herself to be photographed etc. Planting evidence incriminating your own guilt is hardly a good idea, and she must surely have smelt a rat? All this shot in the unimaginative fashion of a typically gritty 1970s British film (with typical music too) which makes us think more of a long episode of THE SWEENEY than anything cinematic (compare the feeble pursuit on the underground here with that in the FRENCH CONNECTION which was obviously the inspiration for it).
ctyankee1
I watched this movie and at first I was going to stop. There is swearing in the first 10 or 15 minutes and after that no more. Michael Caine is a good actor who is some kind of secret agent whose son is kidnapped for money and diamonds. He goes to great lengths to get the government officials to help him get his son back who about 10 years old but they refuse to give him the diamonds. Then he does what a good father does. He snoops around his bosses offices finds the info he needs and get the diamonds out of a safe deposit box.He then has to meet up with the criminals who get lots of joy causing pain to people they capture or need. His son is heard screaming in calls to him in pain. Michael Caine is on the run from bad and good people. Lots of physical stunts. Very violent movie, I could not wait for it to be over but it was a good movie full of action and intrigue.Warning>>> in one of the scenes a woman takes off her coat is nude and proceeds to lay in a bed. Her boss takes a picture of her to make it look like MC is a compromised agent. Michael Caine is a good man and does not know the picture is taken in his room. The crime team leaves other things to make him look guilty to his boss and the police.
rsoonsa
For this work, scenes of "action", a Don Siegel specialty, are less significant than those that generate characterization and plot, functioning to release tension rather than keep it at bay, although the director's customary taut pacing and stoniness are here, within a twisty story largely faithful to its source, a Clive Egleton novel: "Seven Days to a Killing", strongly scripted by Leigh Vance to further define the character-focused film. A cleverly fresh storyline involves a kidnapping, the victim being son of MI-5 operative John Tarrant (Michael Caine), with a ransom demand for greater than one half million pounds worth of uncut diamonds that are resting within a Defence Ministry safe, as an unknown traitorous official has informed the abductors, with subsequent dual scenario devices of Tarrant's struggle to retrieve his son held by illicit arms syndicate villains, along with Ministry efforts to culpably link Tarrant with the conspiracy. The film benefits from attention to continuity, no loose ends rupturing one's concentration, with heed to detail perhaps its primary strength, yet telling contributions come from many, including players Caine, who adds a needed element of engagement to his Harry Palmer persona, Delphine Seyrig giving a splendidly nuanced performance as companion of the principal evildoer (played with effectual guile by John Vernon), and Donald Pleasence earning the acting laurels here as a dispassionate MI-5 security chief, along with Clive Revill, Joss Ackland, and ever intense Janet Suzman.Siegel's hand is apparent in the spare deployment of music, with scoring and silence each appropriately employed; palette and filter for well-composed cinematography and montage (shooting is in London, Paris and the Sussex countryside); a symbolic use of clothing colours; and accomplished post-production efforts, all increasing the worth of a piece undervalued by some reviewers, indeed by Caine himself, unfortunate in the event as the film is one of Siegel's finest, his skill with improvisation mating well with capable workmanship.
