Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

JasparLamarCrabb Expectations certainly must have been very high for this star-studded thriller. Featuring three of the very best European actors (Michel Picoli, Jean-Louis Trintignant and Gian Maria Volonté) with dialog by the great Jorge Semprún, director Yves Boisset put together a fairly inert movie. A not so bright radical (Trintignant) is duped into helping to assassinate Volonté, the exiled president of an unnamed third world country (presumably based on Morrocan leftist leader Mehdi Ben Barka). Picoli is the unpleasant military man tasked with making the hit. Much of the film is spent showing nervous bureaucrats trying to figure out how to dispose of Trintignant once he's deemed a problem. The acting is fine if uninspiring. Trintignant is far too intelligent an actor to be believable in his role. He's not a convincing dummy. Jean Seberg is utterly wasted as his nervous wife. Volonté, usually one of the most inflammatory actors, is really very dull here. Nevertheless, there are some very good things here --- Ennio Morricone's score is perfect and the supporting cast features the likes of Philippe Noiret, Bruno Cremer and Roy Scheider as a deceptively helpful American journalist.

vostf Basically the script was good material but not challenged enough by a young Yves Boisset, who could actually feel overwhelmed/content with the dream team he had to work with.First the hero is too much of a negative schmuck. It would have changed absolutely nothing in the plot to rewrite this character as a little more of a good guy with dark undertones. It is fine to have the big shots disparage him as an inconsistent loser but, movie-wise, it is better to have a slightly too idealistic a character than a downright bitter failed writer.Then the other characters are quite good, but they lack one good scene, one devastating line to nail the storyline. As such L'Attentat feels more like the pedestrian telling of a politically-charged story where they have cameos. Too bad to have such a cast, comprising J-L Trintignant, M. Piccoli, Ph. Noiret, Gian Maria Volonte, J. Bouise, B. Cremer, Jean Seberg and Roy Sheider, only to have them gently speaking their lines, without their inner genius ever surfacing from it all.In the end, this early 70s conspiracy flick fails where most movies in the genre will succeed: here lie too many visible parts of the conspiracy, the chain of command is too obvious, and thus it lacks the sense of fatality of one fine guy pitted against obscure and unassailable forces.

Cristi_Ciopron Leisurely paced and atmospheric, shot in the slightly hazy and charming style of the '70s, the intriguing, bitter and sincere political Leftist thriller benefits from a choice cast—Jean—Louis Trintignant, Michel Piccoli, Jean Seberg (--with her slightly annoying foreign accent; which doesn't mean she ain't straight hot--), Gian Maria Volonté, Michel Bouquet, Bruno Cremer, Philippe Noiret (--unmatched when shown eating--), François Perier, Roy Scheider and Nigel Davenport, L'ATTENTAT by Yves Boisset, dialogs written by Jorge Semprun, scored by Ennio Morricone, is a political subject treated as a Kafkian thriller; and I consider it a very well made movie. In fact, an impressive thriller from the '70s.Quietly exciting, a refined uncanny thriller, L'ATTENTAT leaves the impression of a deeply realist and lucid drama.Morricone composed a vintage score, as good, in the political movies' realm, as the one written by Vangelis for the feature filmed by Gavras with Lemmon.Volonté plays a deeply respectable, presumably, leftist leader from an Oriental country. Piccoli is his nemesis. Noiret does an awesome cameo.The dialectic of the appearances is put to good use. The theme of the confession and of confessing is one of the main themes.With such actors, with such a score …; a prosaic political subject becomes a Kafkian labyrinth, much coldness, betrayal, wickedness and shame.The movie begins a bit preachy with some off-putting tirades and leftist sexual harshness, but it quickly becomes an enthralling drama. Yes, beautifully written and exquisitely played by giants like Volonté, Noiret, Perier, Cremer, Trintignant. Some of them—like Volonté and Trintignant—were familiars of the political cinema. The directing is amply helped by all these ingredients—cast, score, photography—which boost the movie and give it an enigmatic, original charm. This gusto is remarkable.The Leftist characters seem a bit sententious and occasionally declamatory, uttering rubbish tirades of patriotism, Semprun did a mediocre job; but this is only occasional ballast. In contrast, the storyline is surprisingly carefully and masterly followed. Some brutality is considered to manifest the leftist vigor, I believe. Other than that, the script is wonderful—original and interesting.So, with his intriguingly exciting thriller, distinctly impressionist, almost _intimist in its quiet and perceptive take, of a naturally modulated pace, so characteristically European, Boisset has a name in the political cinema. Boisset turned a political subject of an almost terminally abject guy into a work of poetry. Turns it into a realm of tenebrous poetry.I'm bit of a political cinema fan—especially if French or Italian, leftist and from the '70s.

dbdumonteil The precedent user found it hard to catch up with a muddled screenplay;it is sure easy to see why: first he saw a digest version (93 min) whereas the French version has a running time of two hours. And the subject deals with an affair which was widely talked about in the French sixties,but which is virtually unknown abroad:Sadiel (Volonte) was inspired by real-life character Ben Barka who was murdered in mysterious circumstances .I was still a child when it happened but I can remember my mother talk about it indignantly.Yves Boisset is ,par excellence,the French political director.But he was still immature at the time;all the qualities he would display in later works ("RAS" "Dupont-Lajoie" "Allons Enfants" "Espions Lève-Toi" and our French "Paths of gloryesque" "Le Pantalon Rouge" ) are absent here: the tightness,the directness and above all the accessibility.His screenplay looks like a hotchpotch made of all the trendy subjects which were not even those of the Ben Barka era: May 68 and the CRS (the riot police),the guys singing Hare Krishna and more,as the precedent user pointed out.An international cast does not help ;two American stars were hired:Jean Seberg who was fluent in French and sadly who was to die several years later in mysterious circumstances and Roy Scheider who manages quite well with the French language too.Plus all the who's who of the French actors :Jean -Louis Trintignant,Michel Bouquet,Michel Piccoli,and the politically committed Italian Gian Maria Volonte.But it makes the matters worse: it looks like a stream of stars who do not seem to believe in the parts they are playing.