Plantiana Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.

Ehirerapp Waste of time

Limerculer A waste of 90 minutes of my life

Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

The_Film_Cricket I've been trying for years to decide the solitary element the separates Quentin Tarantino from his vast amount of imitators. Since 1992 when he burst out with Reservoir Dogs and turned the basic narrative structure on its head with Pulp Fiction, every two-bit, wannabe filmmaker has been trying to duplicate the formula. They seem to have the notes right, but not the music.Director Keith Parmer is no different. His new film Swelter is a puny modern day western propped up against the influence of Tarantino's Django Unchained and Robert Rodriquez's Once Upon a Time in Mexico, yet it can't approach either of those films because it comes off more as a showcase of violence in slow-motion than developing any kind of character. Worse, his narrative has no purpose. Characters and motivations are muddy and unfocused and often a character is introduced and dispatched without any kind of explanation.If the style comes from Tarantino and Rodriquez, then Parmer borrows the story heavily from Ocean's Eleven (not the new one). His story begins with a flashback structure that features three sweaty guys who spent 10 years in prison for robbing a Vegas casino of several million dollars dressed in masks that look like – you guessed it – The Rat Pack. They're caught. One of their partners is wounded and disappears, and the rest of the movie is focused on a violent bloodbath as the three ex-cons now converge in a small Nevada backwater to find their missing partner-in-crime and uncover what happened to the missing money.Now, as any reasonable moviegoers might assess, that's not much to build a movie on. You need characters and histories and motivations for this to work. Plus, you need dialogue that consists of more than tough talk, sexual innuendo, pseudo-philosophical nonsense and half-assed boilerplate patter that only functions to move the plot along. The fact that one of the robbers is played by Jean Claude Van Damme should be an indication that some neato fisticuffs are on the way. Nope! He just looks mean and shoots people.Swelter is a good looking movie, but its all frosting and no cake. The camera whips around and the actors walk and shoot in slow motion. The opening heist is so filled with close-ups and jump cuts that we hardly get any sense of risk or danger. The rest of the movie is a long, slow haul to the inevitable showdown.Parmer is so satisfied with his style that he forgets to involve us in what is going on. Many of the action scenes look cool but the simplest element of motivation is thrown to the wind. For example, early in the film a bunch of guys break out of a prison chapel by blowing a hole in the wall followed by a shoot-out with the cops. One of the cops was apparently in on the prison break and is suddenly dispatched. It's a cold-blooded moment that is never explained. What follows is a series of scenes of carnage and blood employed by and with characters that we never get to know. They're all pawns in a stylish exercise. You wonder where their motivation comes from, and you're also baffled about why, after the murders of two dozen local cops, the FBI and the SWAT Team aren't converging on this town.If there is a positive in this movie, it comes from two performances that should occupy a more focused story. One is by English actor Lennie James as the robber who disappeared. He has some quiet moments that are effective, especially in his connection with a beaten-down local doctor played by Alfred Molina whose whole physical structure seems motivated by whatever he's experienced in life. These two guys seem to have genuine charm and you can feel the pain of a long and difficult life. A little more exploration of their lives and the movie might have amounted to much more. We lean forward to hear what they have to say. Unfortunately it's drowned out by gun fire and explosions that don't mean a darned thing.

Duchtman One of the worst movies i have seen in a while.Pretty decent story and directing. A couple of the actors were on Tommy Wiseau's level and others really delivered like Grant Bowler and Lennie James, they did a really good job. I did not expect Van Damme to actually be an okay actor. The thing i really disliked were the choice of music and sometimes the music were too high. I only managed to watch half this movie then I almost felt depressed and said to myself; Why am i looking at this when i can actually watch a decent movie.If they changed some of the actors to someone who actually can portray these roles and if they changed the music department it might have got maybe 4-5 stars from me, but as it stands now it will not get more than 2 if it even should have got that many.

homecoming8 After almost 10 years, a couple of criminal friends are released from prison and they travel to a small town in the desert in search of their money from a casino heist. The story begins with their release, but soon the viewer is treated with some shaky and vague flashbacks of the actual heist, probably shot while the camera man was either drunk or high as a kite (probably both). The action is bad, you hope it'll get better but the sad part is that you've just witnessed the highlight of the movie. It all goes downhill from here. The character development is very poor and illogical most of the times. For commercial reasons, we have Jean-Claude van Damme. I was always a big fan of his early work. His recent films have been decent but this has to be his worst movie in probably 10 years. Not that it's his fault, his character is unbelievable and unconvincing: he has absolutely nothing to work with. He's supposed to be the criminal mind of the bunch but all he does is flirt with the local bar lady and gets killed (very easily) by some local punk with a knife. This happens before the 'grand finale' but having seen how that turned out, he can be glad he didn't stick around for the credits. There isn't a single believable character in this dull story. It doesn't seem to bother the town at all that they've been invaded by a dangerous crew. Life just goes on, right ? How clueless the filmmakers really are is perfectly constructed during the final scene. The gimmick of the movie shows that the bag of money was hidden on top of the empty water tower. The bag looks brand new, how is that possible after laying there for almost 10 years in 40 degrees of burning sun ?? Sad that Jean-Claude Van Damme (it was great to see him in Expendables 2)has once again reduced himself to cheap movies that no one really wants to see. His role is not a cameo, but it's not that big either, and totally forgettable.

M MALIK here is my advice to all the big actors who care only about money not their careers to do a low level project once this stamps gets on you it never goes off take Steven Seagal for example a great action hero of our times is doing straight to home video films since last decade,Christian Slater also joined the list now what was Alfred Molina and Jean Claude Van Damme doing here was out of my head these two are the most amazing actors ever appeared on big screen even if they did this for friendship to the director Kieth Palmer or whatever they need to be extremely careful in future.the plot:the story is a rehash of old revenge,betrayal & good vs evil films,whats just happens here is that few guys escape from a prison to find one man who escaped with the cash after the robbery they go to a town where a tough sheriff looks for bad guys.the rest of the film is usual nice people getting in crossfire along with a damsel in distress it gets boring in a few minutes to be honest here people expect too much from the cast not the story in these type of mix genre films i thought JCVD would do some high octane action but i was disappointed he got wasted here.Overall watch Swelter 2014 at your own risk there are some funny moments available but that is not worth the money my rating is 3/10.