ShangLuda Admirable film.

MusicChat It's complicated... I really like the directing, acting and writing but, there are issues with the way it's shot that I just can't deny. As much as I love the storytelling and the fantastic performance but, there are also certain scenes that didn't need to exist.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

davidcarniglia An entertaining drama with great chemistry amongst the main characters--Sinatra, Martin, and Maclaine. Sinatra's character is by far the most interesting; stuck for the most part in a twilight zone between academic respectability and the carefree underworld. The movie shows how he deals with his dilemma, represented by two women; Hyer would be the respectable 'catch', but Maclaine's blowsy character actually wants him. He spends most of the movie fending off Maclaine while fruitlessly pursuing Martha Hyer. Nonetheless, he dips futher into Martin's gambling, boozing, devil-may-care lifestyle. Hyer, though obviously drawn to Sinatra, can't break out of her self-imposed reticence. Sinatra's persistence with his writing parallels his steady courting of Hyer. At least he's ultimately successful with his writing.His decision to marry Maclaine seems sudden. But this is his epiphany: he realizes that, poorly matched as they are outwardly, Maclaine's devotion will actually satisfy his insecurities. Hyer only seems to confuse and anger him. Admittedly, we're dealing with the misogynistic 40s (50s by the time of the movie), in which Sinatra expects Hyer to melt just because he professes love for her. On the other hand, Maclaine tries the same tactic with Sinatra, which ultimately works. The last scene, with its noir overtones of evil invading a wholesome carnival, with its tragic results, first excites, then ends poignantly with Maclaine's murder.In addition, mixing the climactic elements--the wedding with the niece's departure, adding Martin's rescue attempt from the gangster, all literally highlighted by the carnival atmosphere, casts a mythic sheen. Also interesting is Martin's character. One has the impression that he essentially played himself: a likeable hedonist. He manages friendship without emotion--unable to accept Sinatra's marriage, as it implies joining society, instead of operating on its margins as his 'code' necessitates.It's also possible to see Sinatra's giving in to Maclaine as an abnegation. After all, he remains blase towards her, easing up just a bit, as they wander innocently through the carnival. Maybe he didn't make the right choice. The movie casts just this sliver of doubt, leaving us wondering if there is a right choice.The psyschological complexity of the theme, the scaffolding of the plot, and the performances from three fine actors, gives Some Came Running a must-see (and see again) quality.

kijii This is a good drama set in the small town of Parkman, Indiana, in 1946 after the war. Frank Sinatra stars in this movie version of James Jones's second novel, as he had in Jones's first novel, From Here to Eternity (1953).This story depicts a post-war "Coming Home" type of story about a soldier trying adjust to a small gossipy town, where he was never really wanted in the first place--at least by his brother (Arthur Kennedy) and his family who view him as the black sheep of the family.On the one hand, Sinatra's character is viewed as an aspiring and gifted writer that is appreciated by a local school teacher (Martha Hyer) and her wealthy professorial father (Larry Gates). On the other hand, he is viewed by the local newspaper and town gossip, as a no-good drifting drinker and gambler who hangs around cheap bars with his floozy pickup girl (Shirley MacLaine) and his locally acquired gambling partner (Dean Martin). Torn between these two worlds threatens to tear him apart.

gavin6942 In the post-war, the alcoholic and bitter veteran military and former writer Dave Hirsch (Frank Sinatra) returns from Chicago to his hometown Parkman, Indiana. He is followed by Ginnie Moorehead (Shirley MacLaine), a vulgar and easy woman with whom he spent his last night in Chicago that has fallen in love with him.Much of the film was shot in and around the town of Madison, Indiana. Shirley MacLaine reported that Sinatra was "besieged" by the local Indiana women, and that at one point a woman broke through a rope barrier around a house and flung herself at Sinatra as her husband ran to stop her, pleading "Helen, you don't even know the man!" I would not say this is a must-see film, but MacLaine in her early days was always a great actress to see, and this is the first pairing of Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin. This was 1958, still a few years before the glory days of the Rat Pack.

drystyx This movie is a sure cure for Insomnia, except for the most extreme cases.Sinatra and Dino play two guys that don't make a bit of sense, but we're supposed to think they do.In other words, they play the characters they always play in movies together.What they are talking about is not just outdated. It never existed. I was born in 1956, and nothing they do or say makes any sense to me.The movie makes no sense either. It is just a bunch of words strung together, apparently written by people on drugs.It's some sort of melodrama, but don't try to stay awake through it. It'll just make you hate the idiots in the movie even more.Some came running to watch the movie. All left sleeping.