Kattiera Nana I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Cebalord Very best movie i ever watch

Actuakers One of my all time favorites.

Kamila Bell This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.

gridoon2018 It runs a little too long (even at just 74 minutes), Bruce Cabot is a tad colorless in the lead and Margaret Lindsay is not really allowed to be her usual perky self (logically, since members of her family keep dropping like flies), but "Sinner Take All" is still a fairly good murder mystery, with a strong finish (the film tricks the viewer by having the hero be wrong about the culprit, and the motive is well-hidden in plain view in one or two seemingly throwaway scenes), a memorably violent death scene, and some interesting supporting characters, like a cop who is smarter than he looks. By the way, has there ever been a 1930s mystery without a nightclub owned by an ex-gangster who wants to go straight? **1/2 out of 4.

GManfred There are several things to dislike about "Sinner Take All", a 1936 mystery movie from MGM. The main problem is the hard-to-swallow screenplay, in which the hero is an average-guy reporter who also works for a lawyer with a British accent, who represents the rich guy who owns the newspaper, who has three dissolute children with motives to kill him to inherit his money and there are several killings that take place in the family. Got that so far?Anyway, the reporter-lawyer liaison (Bruce Cabot) decides to solve the whole mess and falls in love with the rich guy's daughter (Margaret Lindsay) and tries to prevent her from getting killed. Loads of suspects in the miscast cast, several of whose characters are insufficiently developed to be legitimate suspects. The deus ex machina is really off the wall - of course, the murderer is impossible to determine until the whole surreal plot comes to a head in the last scene.Very unsatisfactory murder mystery with a slapped-together cast and implausible story. I rate it a five because there are mystery fans who will marvel at the cleverness of disguising the murderer, but I felt the movie does not play fair in this regard.

John Seal The strangely titled Sinner Take All is a superior second feature that benefits from a good screenplay, excellent MGM production values, and a fine cast. Director Errol Taggart (who spent the early years of his career editing some of Tod Browning's best Lon Chaney silents, and also got second unit credit on 1932's Freaks) displays some talent with the camera, and there is excellent use of lighting, perspective, and montage thanks to cinematographer Leonard Smith. Also of note are the performances of Bruce Cabot as the hotshot reporter-lawyer on the trail of a serial killer and, of course, George Zucco, whose performance here surely anticipates the advent of C. Montgomery Burns ("EX-cellent!").

krorie "Sinner Take all" was based on the mystery novel, "Murder for a Wanton" by Whitman Chambers. The book title makes a little more sense to me than does the movie title. When I first read the title on TCM's schedule I thought it was some sort of morality play. It turns out to be a fairly decent murder story involving the members of a wealthy family being killed one by one. Bruce Cabot of "King Kong" fame is the reporter/would-be lawyer investigating the strange happenings which tend to point a guilty finger at his would-be girlfriend played by Margaret Lindsay. Why Lindsay never reached star status in Hollywood is a good question since she does such an outstanding acting job in this film. The marvelous Charley Grapewin plays the patriarch, a different type role for him. Joseph Calleia plays a role that suits him well as the owner of a casino with apparent mob connections. George Zucco makes the most of his small part and the old cowboy Raymond Hatton has a brief scene as a hotel clerk. Also watch for Dorothy Kilgallen who appears briefly as a reporter. An actress named Eadie Adams appears as Shirley Allen. She so impressed me that I looked up information on her because I had not seen her in a movie before. She had a very short career. Does anyone know the reason? The character who impressed me the least was Capt. Bill Royce played by Edward Pawley. I was pleased that the writers did not make him a stupid, bumbling policeman but rather a thorough, intelligent investigator. Still the performance seemed stilted and the actor appeared bored in his role.The film was directed by a studio man, Errol Taggart, who at times seemed to copy such movie geniuses as Sergei Eisenstein. By cutting techniques partly developed by Eisenstein he, for example, cuts from a flaming car to a flaming match. Eisenstein always had a symbolic reason for such cutting. There is nothing symbolic that I could see in the cutting used by Taggart. Later, Alfred Hitchcock would wisely use such cutting for metaphoric effect, for example, a train going into a tunnel for sexual consummation.With better scripting--the intended humor often falls flat--and better directing, this could have been one of the best murder mysteries of the period. I especially liked the way the ending was handled. You will be surprised how the guilty person reacts to being caught. If you enjoy old mystery movies, you should like this one.