FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Mathilde the Guild Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

moogyboy There's not really much to spoil here: in the course of one minute, a happy-go-lucky Mickey joins the Army, ships out to Vietnam, gets a VC bullet through his head moments after landing. The final long zoom-in on the dead Disney star is an incredibly powerful image; you can see every young person who fell in that war lying there in his place without having to squint.This has all the hallmarks of an underground work, the grainy and cheap anonymity of something dangerous created in a a basement or a back room after midnight by persons unknown--counterfeit Disney with a very dark streak, violence instead of sex. "Tijuana bibles" and radical comix of the time period come to mind when watching this, but as a film one wonders where and by whom it could have been seen. If this were made today it would probably have a healthy following on YouTube as one of those mysterious creepypasta videos that fuel so many Reddit discussions.My review is based on the version on YouTube linked from the Lost Media Wiki, which includes a modern (and extremely effective) addition of a System Of A Down song on the soundtrack.The '60s is, decades later, a harmless high-kitsch parody of itself as seen through the mass-media nostalgia filter; when you don your Deluxe Hippie Costume Set from the Halloween store and greet your neighbor with a faux-stoned "peace, maaaan!", do you remember what your assumed character is referring to? In this uncomfortable artifact of a bygone era, Mickey has volunteered his life to remind you.

Horst in Translation ([email protected]) "Mickey Mouse in Vietnam" is a really short movie from almost 50 years ago and it features the world's most famous cartoon character (I guess) delivering an anti-war statement here. It was the days of Vietnam War and many were against the American involvement. This also includes Lee Savage and Dave Dixon. This duo came up with this work here and the entire thing only runs for roughly 70 seconds. Mickey decides to go to war, arrives in Vietnam in his uniform and is immediately killed. Oh no. The story or animation is almost entirely forgettable I would say. The only reason this one has some cinematic value is because it depicts the political climate of its time. That's really all there is to it. Interestingly enough Disney himself made many pro-War cartoons during World War II, even if these included mostly Donald and not Mickey. Not much to see here and I don't recommend it. Says a lot that Savage and Dixon did not manage successful careers in the film industry. Their work here is really more of a political statement than a movie. Thumbs down.

bob the moo Having recently watched Donald Duck be a Nazi in a propaganda film from World War II, I came to this film without knowing much but presuming it is probably something similar. Of course within seconds it is clear that this comparatively basic animation is nothing official and it is actually a protest film against the war in Vietnam, where the death of American youth is made incredibly obvious by essentially enlisting and killing that most American of popular culture characters – Mickey Mouse.As a film it is effective in how simple it appears but yet how it ends. The looped animation on a few simple scenes lead to a death scene which is sudden and allows for a sudden shift of tone as we see the light fade from Mickey's eyes – it is strangely effective although it by all rights shouldn't be given how short and basic the film is. The lack of sound is distracting at first (I checked to see if my volume was muted – like many I imagine) but on thinking about it, I think the basics of it meant that sound would have dominated the visuals and it does work without sound.It is a curio film and worth a look just to see it because it is quite simple and basic, however at the same time the very simple delivery and very simple point is surprisingly effective and the change to Mickey's face in that final shot is dramatic and memorable.