ReaderKenka Let's be realistic.

Console best movie i've ever seen.

BallWubba Wow! What a bizarre film! Unfortunately the few funny moments there were were quite overshadowed by it's completely weird and random vibe throughout.

Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

alexandre michel liberman (tmwest) John Brown's story is certainly an interesting one and worth telling. Nobody can go against his main idea which was to free the slaves. The problem, as shown by this film was how his violence and fanaticism went against him. A lawyer at the end mentions that insanity runs in the family, but Brown makes a point of saying he is sane.The film explains his violence by showing it as a retaliation from the attack on Lawrence, Kansas. But you can say the conscience of the film is expressed by the character played by Debra Paget, who tries to hold her feelings in relation to Brown's son (Jeffrey Hunter) on account of Brown's violence. Was his desperate act at Harper's Ferry a catalyst for the civil war? The film shows it as an immediate failure, and leaves the question of its effect on the future on the air. For the story it tells this film is worth seeing, also for the story it does not tell.

MartinHafer In 1940, Raymond Massey played John Brown in "Santa Fe Trail". In this very florid and cartoonish portrayal, Massey played Brown with a gusto that is interesting to watch but probably not at all realistic with his rolling eyes and insane antics. Now, a decade and a half later, Massey gets another chance to play Brown--and this time, the portrait is MUCH more even-handed and realistic. You can probably guess which of the two films I preferred!The film begins in Kansas and Brown seems like a decent and reasonable guy. Sure, he's gung ho about abolishing slavery, but he's no hot-head. However, after pro-slavery vigilantes attack him and his family, Brown is radicalized. Now, he's at war with the slavers--and kills several in cold blood. In other words, you see Brown's progression which ultimately led to his ill-conceived attack on the US armory at Harper's Ferry.Throughout the film, the Brown saga is often shown from the standpoint of one of Brown's sons (played by Jeffery Hunter). It's not a bad plot device and also helps because it provides a counter-point to Brown's eventual antics. Not a brilliant film but a film far, far better and more fair than the sort of ultra-pro Confederacy films that prevailed from the time of "Birth of a Nation" through the 1950s. Relatively fair, realistic and ahead of its time--and a MUCH better performance by Massey as a man, not just some silly lunatic.

John T. Ryan REPRISING THE ROLE of fanatical abolitionist, John Brown, Mr. Raymond Massey seemed to have ratcheted down the intensity a few notches than in his earlier effort. His previous, near classic interpretation of the role quite possibly set the bar high for any following in his trailblazing footsteps.OUR REFERENCE, OF COURSE, is to Director Michael Curtiz's SANTA FE TRAIL (Warner Brothers, 1940); in which the blood thirsty, ultra-militant abolitionist's seditious attack on Harper's Ferry, Virginia, was put down by the youthful cavalry officers Jeb Stewart (Errol Flynn) and George Armstrong Custer (none other than "Dutch" Reagan, himself), who were assisted by an army of Warner Brothers' stock company players.* TODAY'S REVIEWED FILM, which is titled SEVEN ANGRY MEN (Allied Artists, 1955)features a somewhat more sympathetic view of John Brown, "Bleeding Kansas" and the attempt to ignite a spark of armed uprising among the enslaved Negro Population in the South of the early 1860's. More tine is spent in allowing "Captain" Brown to preach,in a somewhat less fanatical manner about all how the institution of slavery is totally wrong and an evil,truly a bane to the young American Republic.THE ONLY QUESTION in contemporary life that compares would be that of Abortion. Referred to in some quarters by the euphemism of "Reproductive Rights", the controversy plagues and divides Americans in much the same manner and with equal intensity as did the two opposite camps on either side of the Mason-Dixon Line in the mid-nineteenth Century. In both instances, the answer is one of an absolute. Either owning another human being, life and death decisions over him and all of the fruits of his labor is an evil or it is not. Either human life is destroyed in abortion and in the use of embroyos' stem cells , or it is not. In either case, there is no room for compromise.THE PRODUCTION TEAM did a fine job of assembling a more than just competent cast for this feature. In addition to Raymond Massey, we have Jeffrey Hunter, Debra Paget, Dennis Weaver, Guy Williams (in pre-Disney Zorro Days), Leo Gordon and James Edwards. The cast is handily filled out by such familiar and competent players as Robert Simon, Dabbs Greer, Lane Bradford, Paul Bryar, Selmer Jackson, I. Stanford Jolley, John Lupton, Kenneth MacDonald, John Larch and Carleton Young.IN VIEWING IT for the very first time recently on the Turner Classic Movies Cable Channel, we came to the conclusion that it was meant to be a movie much in the same genre as those escapist features that were so popular in the 1930's & 40's; so ably churned out by the big studios. The Chief exponent of such production was the previously mentioned Warner Brothers. And this was no mere coincidence that Allied Artists (formerly called Monogram Pictures) was turning out this sort of retro-styled movie.THIS STUDIO,A FORMER denizen of "Poverty Row" was no doubt taking advantage of the then recent release of scores of the old films to television. There, the old movies became familiar to a whole new generation of viewers. hence, they would now be familiar with actors, characters and story lines. If the 1950's movies weren't exactly sequels or remakes, they were essentially a sort of another view of the old story.THE ELEMENTS THAT such movies were most sorely lacking were things like original musical scores from folks such as Max Steiner, the waste no time screenplays and such virtuoso Directors as Raoul Walsh and Michael Curtiz.SEVEN ANGRY MEN is worth your while in viewing; but please don't be disappointed if you find that it's not a sort of THEY DIED WITH THEIR BOOTS ON or DODGE CITY revisited.NOTE: * Off hand, the only other portrayal of Abolitionist John Brown on the screen is in Veteran Character Actor Royal Dano's essaying of the role in the James Garner, Louis Gossett & Susan Clark starring vehicle, SKIN GAME (Cherokee Productions/Warner Brothers, 1971). Can you think of any others?

theowinthrop In 1940 Raymond Massey was at the peak of his film stardom. Born in Canada (the half-brother of Canadian Governor General Vincent Massey), he had established his stardom in England, and appeared in the film THINGS TO COME (1936). He appeared on Broadway in ETHAN FROME and ABE LINCOLN IN ILLINOIS, and the latter was made into a film in 1940 that garnered him an Oscar nomination. He also appeared in SANTA FE TRAIL as the abolitionist revolutionary John Brown. He brought a vividness and commitment to that part that made him (not Errol Flynn as Jeb Stuart) the center of attention. But the script, culminating in the attack on Harper's Ferry in October 1859, was wobbly - trying to placate southern audiences by suggesting the South would have solved the slavery issue without pressure from the North or the abolition movement. For most of the film Massey's Brown is a dangerous nut who is threatening the nation's peace - a fanatic that is striving to cause a slave revolt or war, and has killed several men. No attempt at balance is offered, or even any attempt at Brown's medical history (he had insanity in his family). Only in the last fifteen minutes is Massey's Brown redeemed when a worst type of villain (Van Heflin as a greedy instigator and traitor) betrays Brown's cause. We may not like violence, but Massey is supporting a view of life (anti-slave) that we approve of, whereas Heflin would betray anyone for money (he previously worked for Brown).SEVEN ANGRY MEN (1955) is Massey's second Brown film. Though it still has flaws in retelling Brown's story, it does attempt to show that the forces he faced in Kansas were as violent in a pro-slavery way as he was. We do get a chance to see a cleaned up version of the Ossawattomie Creek massacre, where Brown killed five men (actually cutting them to bits with a sword). And more details are gone into about Brown's planning and financing of the Harper's Ferry attack. Finally, the relations between Brown and his sons, and the sullen dislike of the latter for their father's views, is brought out. Although this is not the definitive Brown film (that still remains to be made) it is a great improvement over the waffling of SANTA FE TRAIL, with Massey still giving the role the right mixture of fanaticism and normality the part requires.