Kailansorac
Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.
Invaderbank
The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Humaira Grant
It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
kyleinnabi
THIS MOVIE IS AWESOME ! ... SUPERIOR TO THE ORIGINAL ... VERY TOUGH CALL BUT SCREAM 2 > SCREAM !!!
marieltrokan
Real violence in a theatre is unreal peace in the real worldReality is not unreal peaceNot unreal peace is real peaceReal peace is peace realUnreal peace in peace realUnreal peace is peace unrealPeace unreal in peace realPeace real is not real realPeace unreal is real unrealReal unreal in not real realReal unreal in realReal fiction in realityFiction not in real realityFiction fiction in real fiction fictionReality in real realityIn out real realityOut in real realityImage inside real realityImage inside fictionInside image fictionThe image of fiction is inside
Davis P
Scream 2 is slightly better than the first scream, I did enjoy the first movie, but I enjoyed this one more. Neve Campbell and Courtney Cox are still just as good as they were in the first movie, their characters haven't changed all that much. You know they say that sequels to movies, especially to scary movies, are usually pretty horrible, but that's just not the case with this film, you get the feeling that they actually tried and put some effort into this one and didn't just phone in another cheesy slasher romp. Some of the scares are the traditional jump scares and usuals that everyone is used to, but they are still pretty fresh and they work. The acting is good and I enjoyed the performances. The gore factor isn't as much present as it was in the first one, but it's still very much there, so just be aware that that's there, in case you're someone who gets squeamish easily or just hates seeing blood. The plot is what you would expect, but with a few twists and turns that you probably won't see coming, at least I didn't, but maybe you're more attentive than I am lol. I personally really enjoyed those plot twists, I thought they were clever and well done. The writing is pretty average for this kind of film, it's similar to the first. Oh and you also get to see some of Sarah Michelle Gellar, she racked up the horror in '97 (I know what you did last summer). 8/10.
bruingal-28746
The beginning scene at the sneak preview of "Stab" is too unreal. No ONE behaves like that inside a theater room; people running around with fake knives, throwing popcorn at the screen, and acting like it's a playground. Second, WHY would a horror film based on real murders allow masks and fake knives inside the theater ? It's common sense. I just find it too unrealistic and cheesy. You don't put people in danger by handing out killer's masks, making it way too easy for actual murders and/or dangerous activity to take place. Don't get me wrong, I love Wes Craven and re-watching 90s flicks, but the only thing making this film tolerable is Gale's character and Deputy Dewy.
