Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

Caryl It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties. It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

nammage The play this is based on, first produced in 1957 (I believe) flopped. Then the great director Sidney Lumet took a stab at it in a loose adaptation film called 'The Fugitive Kind' from 1960 starring Marlon Brando and Joanne Woodward which was also a flop (though has a 7.2/10 rating here at IMDb) though ironically Tennessee Williams has a play from 1937 called "The Fugitive Kind" but the Lumet film was not based on it; but Williams' play 'Orpheus Descending' was a revision of the 1940 work "Battle of Angels". Confusing, no? What's my point to all that? So many, including Williams, tried to make this story work and never could, really. Well, not until a well-worked yet relatively unknown writer/director Peter Hall. His adaptation is closely aligned to Williams' version, and actually works pretty well on screen.This film stars Kevin Anderson as Val Xavier, a singer drifting through town who gets a job at Lady Torrance's store. Lady is played by the great actress Vanessa Redgrave. Lady is married to Jabe who's played by Brad Sullivan, who's dying of cancer and is also the man who killed Lady's father; Lady hates Jabe but remains married to him anyway; though Jabe eventually tells hers, most likely because he's dying. Anne Twomey plays Carol Cutrere who is actually linked to Val in the play but not so much in the film but that she feels like saving him; though there may be one scene where Val alludes to Carol in a flashback scene but it's not entirely clear he's talking of Carol. I felt that, while there are many aspects to the story, this film was about being saved from either the horrific tortures of one's life or to a basic degree being able to free oneself from the constraints of it. The ending of the play and the ending of this film is the same but different. While Lady does get shot by Jabe in both, Val, in the play dies in a building fire where as in the film Jabe sets him on fire reminiscent of how he and the Klan killed Lady's father. I thought that part was a homage, if nothing else. I could be wrong, though. The powerful creativity of this film isn't the acting, or necessarily the direction, it's the poetry of the words which I am sure would come off confusing to some or just link it to one of the few weird films such as those directed by Lynch or Cronenberg. Personally I felt it's sort of like the 1982 film 'Deadly Drifter' (also known as 'Out' which is the title of the novel it's based on) which starred Danny Glover and Peter Coyote. Mainly in the way it moves around: entrancing yet subtle in certain ways. Michael Emerson had his TV & Film debut (played Benjamin Linus on the TV show 'LOST') in this film playing the clown toward the end of the film. It's a very small part and you won't recognize him but I thought it worth mentioning. It's a vibrant film. No lack of excitement. Very well written. As TV films go, it wasn't that bad overall.

rebeccax5 Somehow I had never seen this. It showed tonight on Turner Classics and Vanessa Redgraves, who was always great, took it to a level I had never seen this or the play before. I hope there is video obtainable of this on the stage with Redgraves and Anderson.When acting is as great as this it legitimizes the profession to do more the pander or entertain. It's both tragic and comic as well as a statement on human stupidity and evil.

Clothes-Off Only someone who has never heard of Anna Magnani could watch Vanessa Redgrave's performance and not think of her. To be fair the part in Tennessee Williams' original play was written for Magnani; I just wish somehow she could have made it her own. When she spits out Lady Torrance's best lines, she might as well just look skyward and give the late Italian star a wink. As for the story itself, it is still provocative even viewed by todays eyes--perhaps even more, as thankfully fewer people are accustomed to seeing such deeply rooted racism. However, in this era in which we've come to expect plot twists and character development, there is surprisingly little change in any character from beginning to end. Each person in this story is exactly who he/she appears to be, which will be very frustrating viewing for those who like to see a moral or have someone at least learn something from what has transpired. And since a rather repulsive gossipy woman reveals a rather important detail at the very beginning, I kept hoping for other secrets of some sort to be unveiled. The affected young (by comparison), ghostly Charlotte (Anne Twomey) surely has a story or two to tell, but it never comes. This is not so much a flaw in the script, but rather a warning that it's not the kind of story I expected it to be. It is a clear style choice by Williams, I'm just not sure that less is more in this case. If anything, it made me long for a depiction of the ancient mythical Orpheus on which this play is based.

alicecbr Vanessa, an Italian in lower Slobovia, I mean Lousiana or Mississippi.....what a background to play against. This Tennessee Williams classic has great allusions to 'crossing the river', so read up on your Greek mythology before watching this movie. All of us with Southern accents cringe at the dead-on representation of the hypocritical upright citizenry of this pitiful town. The dying husband/Klansman who had burned out his wife's father many years before (and burned her father, as well, we find out) comes to life in the finale as he applies the torch to the hero. The hero, a young man in a snakeskin jacket, gives new life to three downtrodden women. One of them, driven crazy by the town's abuse, shows acute intelligence warped beyond redemption by her suffering.This one is not a light excursion into escapist fare. The fact that most of Tennessee Williams' plays pull back the mask from Society's hypocritical face is certainly emphasized here. We make our compromises with what we learned in Sunday School and one day, we join a gang that strips and sets fire to those who are 'different' among us. When they in turn go berserk, as in Columbine, we blame the movies !!(?). Who is truly insane here?Right on characterizations by the four townswomen, each one familiar to us. The artist who escapes into religious visions after facing lynchings and chain gangs, supervised by the brutality of her sheriff husband, fills the screen with her plain soul-beauty. We were taught of 'Southern Schizophrenia' in Sociology: the cleaving in two of our brains in order to co-exist with going to church three times a week and twice on Sunday.... and our savage mistreatment of the 'different', usually black, Jewish or Catholic. That was then and now is now......are we any different?See it. Find yourself in it. Not an easy trip, because the 'Orpheus descending' is you and me.