Pluskylang Great Film overall

Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

JohnHowardReid Even more impressive than most of the well-known silent titles, this movie is a real discovery! In fact, pictorially and dramatically it is one of the best silents ever made! Alan Crosland's riveting "Old San Francisco" (1927) would be most difficult to go past. For one thing, Dolores Costello is surely the most convincingly beautiful heroine of all time. On the other side of ledger, name someone who can present a more thoroughly nasty display of villainy than that so masterfully enacted by the great Warner Oland. The support cast is likewise legendary: Charles Emmett Mack as the hero (a fine actor who was killed in a car accident three months before this film was released); Angelo Rossitto in perhaps his largest and most sympathetic part; always-welcome Anna May Wong in a promising but ultimately small role; and the Prologue's Martha Mattox, casting aside her sinister persona. (You can't have everything, even in a lavishly directed masterpiece such as this). Available on a 10/10 Warner Archive DVD.

MissSimonetta Old San Francisco (1927) had to have been made with only its special effects and Vitaphone soundtrack as the major attractions, because the story is extremely old-fashioned by 1927 standards. It feels like the sort of plot one would see in a movie from the 1910s.The characters are flat as can be, especially the ingenue played by Dolores Costello. Warner Oland plays the yellow peril villain, who indulges in every crime: stealing the property of others, imprisoning his dwarf brother, oppressing Chinese Americans, and sneaking into Costello's house at night in an attempt to sully her virtue. It's just terrible.One reviewer scolded the other user reviews for projecting contemporary attitudes onto an old film. While this gives the film a little leeway and I think we should put more energy into the still prevalent racism of current Hollywood cinema, that does not make the overt racism against Asian-Americans in this film okay or any less uncomfortable to watch.The effects are unimpressive compared to other special effects-heavy films of the decade and the acting is barely competent. Skip it.

MartinHafer One thing you sure have to say about OLD SAN FRANCISCO is that it is a very lovely film to see. The print, though very old, is in almost pristine shape (at least the version they showed on Turner Classic Movies) and the soundtrack exceptional. In addition, the director and cinematographer were absolutely brilliant--making the most of every scene with the most artistic touch for a silent I have seen in a very long time. Delores Costello is simply luminous thanks to them and so many of the scenes were treats for the eyes--such as the scene between Costello and her suitor at the fountain. It just doesn't get much prettier than this.As for the story, it was nice to see that Hollywood was trying to be sensitive towards Hispanic-Americans, as they are shown in a very sympathetic light. A major problem is that despite being so very pro-minority, none of the people playing these roles are Hispanic--a very common problem in Hollywood until the 1960s (and sometimes beyond). Today such a practice would be condemned--in 1927, it was par for the course. In this film, Delores Costello did a great job acting (she was terrific), but she looked about as Hispanic as Shirley Temple. If you don't believe me that such casting was common, try watching a Charlie Chan or Mr. Moto film---as these characters were repeatedly played by actors of European descent. In fact, Warner Oland who popularized the Chan role is even in this film playing the role of a big dumb jerk who happens to be a Mongolian man posing as a White man! Oh, and most of the Asians in this film are drug dealers, pimps or assorted low-lifes, so I am pretty sure Asian-Americans probably didn't line up to see this film! The story is about a family of noble Spanish blood living in San Francisco in the early 20th century. Though they have lived there before the Americans arrived, they are continually treated like outsiders as the Anglos and Chinese gangs take advantage of them again and again. Thanks to a nice young Irishman who has fallen for sweet Delores, the family has a benefactor and things might work out for the better....or not! See it for yourself to see if sweet Delores manages to escape the lecherous clutches of the Chinese underworld white slavers and greedy land speculators (for a hint: God doesn't like what is happening and perhaps He'll have to intervene).Despite the film's many shortcomings and overt racism as well as a sappy ending (all of which can be understood based on the age of the film and prevailing social mores), the film certainly IS exciting--mostly because of its scandalous subject matter and fast pace. This combined with the artistic nature of the film make it a film worth seeing. Just don't let your politically correct friends and co-workers know! The sight of Oland's midget brother kept locked in a cage throughout the film like a dog is just too much to bear.

mcgintyjerry Geez! People who try to project 21st century political correctness on those who were living their lives decades (sometimes centuries) ago give me a pain. Are they saying we've now achieved some level of perfection, or at least that now everything has been figured out? They have the advantage of being sure that years in the future when present-day man is criticized for events and attitudes that even those enlightened ones can't foresee, they'll not be around to hear it.These attempts to ensure that anyone not holding some particular viewpoint must necessarily be dismissed as irrelevant and evil despite the level of talent of the offender (occasionally a genius) by the critics (usually possessing no talent).