Alicia
I love this movie so much
Fairaher
The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.
Siflutter
It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.
boyinflares
If the first "Mommy" film wasn't bad enough, the sequel "Mommy's Day" is...just the same. Just as absurd, just as try-hard and just as cheap. Although, it looks like the director went and bought himself a new handi-cam, as the quality is a tad superior to the first film.But really, although it was a nice idea over all, no one really seems like they wanted to participate in this film. Rachel Lemieux's Jessica Ann has turned into a right little brat, Brinke Stevens' Beth is still as spineless as she was in the first film (though Brinke is a good actress, she just looked rather bored here) and Patty McCormack's Mommy is as insane as ever - or is she? Seriously though, this crazed Mommy manages to convince a couple of incompetent security staff to let her have her hands free when she is going to be given her life-ending injection - what's with that? A year later, Mommy is on some experimental new mood controlling drug, yet all these strange murders begin to happen, and of course Mommy is at it again - or is she??? Poor Marian Wald has a great scene reprising her role from the first film, though that's all she gets to do. Sarah Jane Miller also from the first film returns playing the sister of her original now deceased character, and is once again one of th main reasons for watching the film, she's a riot. Paul Peterson is okay as Paul Conway's, Beth's scheming husband, and Paula Sands is rather good playing herself, a supposedly famous talk show host. Interesting.Unless you have some dire compulsion to watch poor-quality films, or were so obsessed with the first film, stay away from this one, you won't get anything out of it except a few unprovoked laughs.
empty2005
The Original Mommy was amazing but when I saw this I was disgusted by the poor effort put into this movie. The story is lame and pointless. There is 0% Gore and the editing is poor. The title is lame, the acting is horrible and the plot seems to go nowhere. The first Mommy was great but this is just rubbish. The story is confusing and set a distance away from the first movie. What a load of crap. . What does the title have to do with the story? Mommy's Day? Why not Mommy's Revenge or Mommy Restored?** Story 1.0/10 Horrible Story ** Acting 4/10 Bad Acting** Gore 0.1/10 Virtually No Gore** Overall 1.7/10. Major Plot Holes: Why did Mommy get released in the end if she is mentally ill??
bfan83
While this movie has a freakin' tidal wave of murders. It still does not live up to the original. This type of movie wasn't made to have countless, senseless murders. It was made to be atmospheric and keep you guessing. And this time around it did not do that for me. Also, Brinke's acting went downhill in this one and the little girl turned into a little brat. This movie just sucks. 1 out of 10.
non_sportcardandy
having seen the bad seed and enjoying it I was glad to see this movie of Rhoda as an adult.This very low budgeted film is entertaining because of the talents of Patricia(Patty)McCormack playing the main character.The poor vhs copy I have can't hide her icy stares or take away anything from her cut through ice comments.The life of anyone getting between her and her little daughter is in danger.It get's to the point where a person tryiny to keep them seperated is told by the little girl " I wouldn't do that if I were you".To my surprise the story did not turn out predictable which was like a bonus.For old timers an extra added attraction was a decent performance by former child star Paul Petersen.
