Mjeteconer Just perfect...

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Francene Odetta It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

Raven-1969 True love demands certain sacrifices, so Ruby regularly visits her husband Derek in prison, works hard to pay household and legal expenses, and endures frequent and unbearable lectures from her mother regarding bad life choices. Her husband is a good man, so it is worth it. Time, however, has a way of changing things. Despite her devotion, Ruby faces temptations and disappointments. She struggles to maintain her dignity and composure, and to shine even on her worst day.This elegant and complex film is a little hidden treasure waiting to be discovered. I was delighted to find it. The photography is one of the best things about it; colorful and beautiful images (mostly at night) make the film a gem even if it had no sound. The moody music, acoustic and ambient, adds to the magic. The story, acting and directing are also extremely well done. This film must have been a profound influence for Moonlight, or be connected to it in some way, for both films are similar in appearance, aura and stupefying impressions they leave. Winner of best director prize at Sundance.

calvinnme The couple involved seem like a typical middle class couple. She is a registered nurse with plans to go to medical school. Her husband - I don't think the film ever mentions his legitimate profession. But he is at the beginning of an eight year sentence in a federal penitentiary for gun running.When we first meet the young couple they are talking in the visiting room at the prison. You can touch and embrace when you first meet, but NO KISSING! She is trying to encourage him. She will put her plans on hold so she can talk to him every night and see him every weekend. She tells him to keep one phrase in his head "five years good time", the shortest sentence he can do if he just stays out of trouble. Since the gun running was his only run in with the law, she figures this is a piece of cake. But it isn't.So much of the film is just the camera pointed at the wife - her face is so expressive you almost don't need words. You see the daily ennui of her life. You see her dealing with her dysfunctional relatives, doing a job she is good at - registered nurse - but wanting more, going through papers she has neatly filed away readying for his release. And then some good news. After just four years there will be a parole hearing. At first their original lawyer says she is not available. The truth is she wants half of the money upfront. This is just like a lawyer. They want to sweep unpleasant confrontations based on capitalism under the rug, but Ruby (the wife) gets the truth out of the lawyer, and gets her to agree to appear at the parole hearing. Ruby manages to scrape together the money the attorney wants.The parole hearing is a disaster. Apparently Ruby's husband Derek has been involved in one assault and is named as the instigator in a second. Then comes what Ruby was not prepared to hear. Derek has been sexually involved with a now fired female guard. We never see or even hear Derek's side of things. His lawyer just keeps mentioning "no charges were ever filed" as Derek's defense. It's artful how the film lets the audience fill in what happened. Here is a middle class guy, with probable minimal street smarts, among men who probably did not get here by dropping out of Sunday school. So his parole hearing is basically civilized people in civilized society measuring Derek's behavior in prison by civilized standards when prison is the law of the jungle.This is where the actress playing Ruby should have won an Academy Award. With just the expression on her face, at the parole hearing, she goes from the optimism of somebody about to greet someone returning from a long journey, to the dazed face of someone who realizes she has endured four years of deferred dreams and celibacy for somebody she might not even know anymore. Her face falls like a cake in an oven. Hey, if Luise Rainer could get Best Actress in 1936 for what amounts to one phone call in "The Great Ziegfeld", what about this?? The next time Ruby and Derek meet - and it is a few weeks - Ruby is a changed woman. She has a harder look on her face, and even a harder looking hairdo. Before she has been all smiles - almost angelic in appearance. Not anymore. What transpired since the parole hearing? What does she tell Derek? I'll let you watch and find out. Highly recommended.

jmc4769 This movie has gotten glowing reviews from the critics and a few very positive reviews on IMDb. But the current user rating on this site is 4.9, which should tell you something. On the plus side, the acting is good, particularly in the case of Emayatzy Corinealdi (Ruby) and Omari Hardwick (Derek). Hopefully, we'll be seeing these two in more movies. The script effectively shows the dilemmas facing so many women whose husbands and boyfriends are in jail. But even though the movie has a lot of dramatic tension, it's really slow going. There are way too many pauses in conversations while the camera focuses on a character's face. The conversations between Ruby and Derek and between Ruby and her new boyfriend are painfully slow and awkward. It's as if you took a normal conversation and cut out two-thirds of the words. And there are way too many long musical interludes. You can't get to know characters well enough when there is so little dialog. And musical interludes are no substitute for drama. It also got a little annoying to always see faces in extreme closeup. Still, this is a worthwhile effort about an important subject.

jpwilliams88 Middle of Nowhere offers a beauty that is almost inarticulate in its depth. Whatever one may think that they are going to get from a story about a couple's struggle to have their relationship survive the husband's incarceration, Ava DuVernay rightly skips over the cliché straight into a story of truth, brokenness, and dignity. The truth that comes like a firestorm for the lead character is immediate and confrontational to her existence. She's a woman who, in trying to do the right thing, embarks on a journey for the real thing. DuVernay is not afraid of ambiguity for her film or her characters. This fearlessness begets the dignity in embracing one's brokenness as the only path to healing and true hope. True hope – not a cookie-cutter version of hope – but a hard won, gritty, and soul-freeing journey to a hope belies an understanding and embracing of the pursuit of purpose as a journey and not a destination. Middle of Nowhere illustrated that peace and redemption is not always pretty. DuVernay takes her time in the telling of this story. This time is a gift given to the viewer – the gift of sitting with the characters and not merely experiencing an emotional drive-by for the sake of a slick, face-paced delivery. I cannot say enough about the performances in the film. Emayatzy E. Corinealdi is a jewel of an actress. David Oyelowo and Omari Hardwick approach their roles with authenticity and clarity. DuVernay and the entire cast and crew create and invite the audience into a beautifully complicated world and then trust the audience to do the "heavy lifting" of interpretation.