Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

BootDigest Such a frustrating disappointment

Ceticultsot Beautiful, moving film.

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

kill-the-boxtrolls This film was terribly done. I'm glad I got it from the library and didn't have to pay $19.59 at Amazon to throw it into the garbage. I nearly turned the show off because of how scary and stupid it was. In fact, I could've watched Monsters, Inc. instead to get my 30 minutes back despite that Monsters Inc. is longer than this crap. The character voices are the same as the show, so there's nothing to worry about them, but the new actors they added for the new characters such as Lauren Bacall. I've always thought that Andrea Libman did a good job with Madeline, but I didn't like the other voice actress. She sounds gay with the other one and not french accent. Okay, on with the storyline.The plot is a continuation to the ended series where Madeline talks to her friends about the truth of her family. Then, Miss Clavel walks to the door and comes up with her uncle, then she has to go live with HIM. Soon, he reveals himself as a villain and locks the little girl up in a chamber with a bunch of other girls who have to work on hair laces with projects. She soon makes a new friend and a woman villain gets mad at her and separates her by putting her in a small little chamber.Now, the plot I've just written just scared me even though I'm a 17 yr ole teenage boy. The person who wrote it probably doesn't know how children feel when they are locked up in a dungeon. Did they get this idea from Oliver Twist? The Princess Bride? Well, those were good movies because they were unique. Madeline is based off of a popular collection of children's' books that Ludwig Bemelmans used to write back in the 30s' and those books were supposed to be childlike and kid-friendly, but no, this writer wants to abuse Madeline and make it not kid-friendly. It's too scary for younger children and it's too boring for even the older viewers.Avoid this Madeline and watch the 1998 live action version or the series. They are both good while the live-action version is somewhat mean but childlike with a sense of humor and somewhat educational while the show is very educational with kid-friendly adventures and a childlike sense of humor, but Lost in Paris is tended to scare children so please do not watch this.

amdgjmj Based on characters and settings created by author/artist Ludwig Bemelmans in 1939 in his book "Madeline", this is a wonderful 75-minute musical feature for very young children. Our two-year-old girl loves it even though the plot is sophisticated enough to please a ten-year-old. The voice talents of Christopher Plummer (as the narrator) and Lauren Bacall are superb. The characters speak and sing with charming Parisian accents, often breaking into a little genuine French. Like the book, the narration is in verse. The drawings are certainly cleaner than Bemelmans' originals yet retain their stylized charm, including the famous scenes of actual places throughout Paris and the "twelve little girls in two straight lines" led by Miss Clavel.The story is a new one created 60 years after the book's publication. Its central theme is "family". Unlike the book, here little Madeline seems to be an orphan and longs for a family of her own. Hoping to find long-lost relatives she undergoes a dangerous adventure in which she learns that some of the essential attributes of family may be found among friends with whom one breaks bread. The resourceful and brave Madeline is helped by old friends and helps new ones in turn.Do not confuse this film with a series of 20-minute cartoons made about a decade earlier. Although also narrated by Christopher Plummer, these shorts are cheap Saturday-morning affairs without merit in plot, animation or music. By contrast "Madeline Lost in Paris" is a keeper.

Harrypotterfan_1996 Madeline: Lost in Paris, Eh? First off, Its for kids aged 4-8, maybe 9. I had this when i was little, and i watched it today because i wuz bored. I wuz alone, though. I have just finished watching it, and i must say, its a little boring, but, well, its for kids age 4-9, so, what can i expect? The songs were a little catchy, (in an annoying way) So anyway, it shows about 5 new songs, one sining about familys, another for the grown ups entertainment done by the girls etc. So anyway, if you have little kids aged 4-8, i'd suggest this movie. If you cant find it on the shelfs or in a bargain bin for 5 bucks, i'd go on E-bay or Amazon. So yeah, thats about it.

dbanner5 Is this movie represented by the band called Lost in Paris out of Philadelphia at www. lost in Paris band. com (no spaces)I was curious because I do not think there is a very close connection, but perhaps one of the band members is somehow related to the director of the film. In fact I believe I did hear one of the members saying something about that, and that is how they came up with the name. Perhaps they were trying to promote familiarity with the movie title in artistic circles.Still it seems a very remote possibility as the music performed is not original, but rather cover songs