AniInterview Sorry, this movie sucks

Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

Mark Kelly If you know nothing about Martha Gellhorn then you should definitely see this uneven movie. She was a war correspondent, among other things, in the 20th century The film uses Zelig-like effects to insert the lovers into history, often in black and white. The film ends rather abruptly showing Hemingway's end, but not Gellhorn's. The film is overlong. Again, worth a look as an introduction to Gellhorn.

jakob13 HBO's 'Gellhorn and Hemingway', a bio picture, is 155 minutes in running time. The story of Martha Gellhorn and Ernest Hemingway might have deserved better treatment as a straightforward documentary than a film made for television and the widescreen. Nicole Kidman is Gellhorn and the talented but underrated Clive Owen is Hemingway. There is no other way to call them since they are strong personalities and unstoppable in the pursuit of fame and fortune, love and war. No, they aren't the Martha and George of Albee's 'Whose Afraid of Virginia Woolf', but they, each in their own way, seem indestructible personalities, immovable objects that in the end proved incompatible. The fires of passion ignite from the moment Gellhorn meets Hemingway in Sloppy Joe's bar in Havana Cuba in the mid-1930s. The crucible of strong and barely controllable emotion flare up in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. Gellhorn proves an apt pupil who learns her craft of writing during war from Hemingway, and she is the inspiration for Maria in his homage to the people of Spain and the International Brigades who fought for the Spanish Republic against the fascist Franco and his Nazi and Italian allies. Were this a simple roll in the hay during the bombing of Madrid, Philip Kaufman's film would be simply another banal love story. It is not. He uses vintage newsreel of the fighting, the street life of Madrid during bombings, the exuberant attach to life in the face of overwhelming odds that the legitimate Republic would prevail against the fascists, with antiquated arms, motley crew of volunteers from Europe, Canada and the US, whose governments imposed an embargo on aid to the democratic government of Spain. Only Soviet Russia offered arms and aid, which complicated the glue that seemed to hold Republic Spain together--democratic, anarchist and communist. In a way, it is a quick study of the people who went to Spain: Joris Ivans who made the sharply strong and powerful 'Spanish Earth' that Hemingway narrated; the photographer Robert Capra, the writer John Dos Passos, whom left a sour taste in Hemingway's mouth. (Dos Passos was less enthusiastic about Hemingway's 'To Have and Have Not', a critique that didn't set lightly on the author's ego.) The interplay of personal rivalry, bravado and love making, more than anything that makes the drama of the first act to World War II vivid and realistic and more or less faithful to the era and the narrative. Biden by the war bug that ultimately will break the marriage of Gellhorn and Hemingway, Kidman as 'Marty' rushes off to cover that small war of Finland's resistance to Russian invasion 1939, in a land grab following the signing of the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact. Gellhorn at the Finnish front tested the couple's union: Hemingway wanted a woman at home to care for his every whim. Gellhorn, as the daughter of a suffragette, was not cut out for that stay at home role. With an assignment to go to China, Gellhorn takes Hemingway along. He seems less enthralled but goes along; his wife is the star even though his reputation precedes him. In brief scenes, Kaufman manages to recreate the squalor and horror of the Japanese war against China; he even manages to convey the brute strength of Chinese coolies during the difficult and tiring journey on the Yangtze, as though it had come out of John Hersey's 'A Single Pebble'. The HBO film had its lighter but macabre moment when the couple meet Chiang Kai Shek and his wife the American-educated Soong Mai Ling, Mme. Chiang. Nonetheless, it was the coverage of the opening of the second front in the Europe theater of war that broke the marriage, Collier's Magazine regularly employed Gellhorn as a war correspondent, but the lure of Hemingway's name made the magazine appoint him as correspondent for the landing of Allied troops in France. Gellhorn felt betrayed and cleverly devised a way to stow away on a troop ship of nurses, and thus became the first correspondent to go ashore with the troops on D Day. Meanwhile Hemingway found his fourth wife Mary and ended up wounded in the hospital after a night of heavy drinking in a car accident. And here ends the saga of Gellhorn and Hemingway as Kaufman ties up loose ends: Hemingway's suicide and 30 years later with David Frost interviewing Gellhorn, who has not lost her spunk and hard edge as she prepares on the cusp of 90 to cover yet another war. The film does show the fear of loss of manlihood and his loss of sexual and mental prowess. The narrative is told from Kidman's point of view, which is more faithful to the record. Owen gives a good portrait of Hemingway's lust for life and vanity and his unstoppable genius at writing until it is hinted he descended into dementia.

bob_meg What exactly was Phillip Kaufman trying for with this film? Kaufman's a pretty great director, but the material he's given to work with here doesn't even succeed as melodrama.It's not flattering to Gelhorn, so that's out. Hemingway's already been (justifiably) reviled in many other outings. Most of the war sequences are either simply unbelievable or grotesquely long. It takes a special kind of anti-talent to make conflict and history boring, but Jerry Stahl and Barbara Turner take it there in spades.It's not a plausible love story, or even a true one (Gelhorn cheated many times on Hemingway). It's not inspiring, interesting, or fascinating.Why HBO let them shoot a 155 minute opus that amounts to another lame 9 1/2 Weeks parody is just staggering.Avoid this film, it's as narcissistic and self-indulgent as Hemingway's overrated body of work and reputation. He was more a product of marketing than literature. So is this movie.

alex-278 I don't normally comment on scripts and direction as I have little knowledge of how their contribution to a good film is best judged, however with this film it is probably safe to say that both of these factors have played a part in making this film appear stifled, contrived staged and utterly unconvincing. Even from the opening scene in the bar - I found myself wondering if this was a stage play with characters nailed to a spot and delivering lines - it was utterly unconvincing. Alas the film continues in this vein and does not get any better. It is over two hours of poor dialogue and pained expressions from Nicole. If I had to reflect generously on the acting of anyone it would be of Clive - he does a good job with the material available.I won't be drawn into suggesting its poor attributes are due to it being made for television, as you just have to watch NetFlix's House of Cards to see that films made for TV can be extremely well made if the scripts are well crafted and the direction inspired.