WasAnnon Slow pace in the most part of the movie.

Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

teuthis I've seen "Fangs" several times and I have always enjoyed it. It is just a classic monster picture. So one should not expect too much from it except some good, old-fashioned monsters, in the form of bats; and some campy acting by a capable cast that tries its darnedest. Considering the genre and it's history, one is either going to love these thrifty, chimerical adventures; or not. If you're a real fan of monster movies, then I think "Fangs" satisfies quite well. "Fangs" has bat attacks; a really slimy bad guy; a cute, determined heroine; some comical teens; and even a half-effective hero. The story moves right along, and even though one pretty much knows what is going to happen, the ride is fun, and the bats are suitably scary. I say just watch it for what it is and enjoy the old monster formula worked to a tee. It's great fun.

filmfreak-5 Sometimes when you rent a video cassette or DVD you don't expect much, especially if the packaging looks poor. Well, this was the case with this one, but nothing prepared me for what a load a c**p this was gonna be. I mean, I didn't expect a drama Pacino-style, but a somewhat entertaining horror film that I have a soft spot for. It was not even a horror film. I have NO idea what Corbin Bernsen was thiking accepting his role - he's not a world class actor, but still TEN times better than this (then ofcourse, he accepted a role in The Dentist too..)The storyline is awful, I'd almost say there ARE none, and the acting - oh my god, the humanity - especially those two teenage girls posing as assistants for the doctor in the beginning of the movie. Never before have I seen such highschool-amateur-theater on film in my life - and me saying that says a LOT. I crumbled my toes and actually felt ashamed wasting my time watching.This film does not even deserve ONE point, it is a disgrace!

HumanoidOfFlesh I watched this piece of horse crap yesterday and I was disappointed."Fangs" offers literally nothing new aside from a shocking similarity to another really bad horror flick "Bats".Corbin Bernsen is completely wasted as a local businessman,the rest of the cast is also horrible.There is absolutely no gore nor suspense,so fans of horror will be disappointed.The film is bland,generic and completely anemic.Avoid this bloodless piece of crap like the plague.1 out of 10.

lorenellroy If this serves any other purpose than to make the similarly themed Bats look like a cinematic masterpiece in comparison,then it escapes me. A horde of mutated bats are deliberately released into a small California community,which is under the sway of an unscrupulous property developer,who aided by his henchmen -a corrupt police chief and a dim,strongarm man -is intent on building a tacky housing development in the area and is not too scrupulous as to methods Ranged against him and the pesky critters are a lady cop ,the town animal control officer ,his daughter and her stoner boyfriend. The dialogue seeks for the witty and achieves only flippancy.The acting is dire and special effects wobbly. Miss-unless you like crud.