TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

jtindahouse 'Evidence' is a very clever movie. Generally we have come to associate the 'found-footage' genre with horror movies, and one could possibly argue that 'Evidence' is in a way a horror movie. But to me it is far more of a mystery/thriller and the 'found-footage' concept works exquisitely in terms of the story. To have multiple cameras all being introduced one after another and adding a different perspective to the mystery added a great deal of depth to the film. The end result is a fantastically crafted thrill ride full of mystery and twists.The only negative I could find about this movie is that it does get a little convoluted and confusing through the middle. There is so much going on and with the camera angles obviously not being ideal (simply due to them keeping the 'found-footage' concept realistic) that it is a little hard to follow. I didn't find this to detract much from my overall enjoyment of the film however. Other than that I can't really fault the film. The structure, pacing and acting were all of a very high standard and I would thoroughly recommend this film to as many people as I can.

David Roggenkamp What starts out as a crime scene investigation quickly turns into a sub-genre as police investigate lost footage. That's right, the movie is a lost footage flick with a twist. The police investigation is the main meat of the movie, with the lost footage only serving as the filler. This makes sense as lost footage films are normally full of filler and lots of screaming anyway. Only this time it is police chasing a madman through a film and an audience observing the police instead.The killer in question does something unique – he uses a torch cutter to dismember his victims and light them on fire. The killer also does something unique to strand his victims – barbed wire underneath the bus that is transporting the targets. Not unique is the fact there is a gas station in the middle of the desert; also not unique is the fact it is young college students en route to a trip of fun (Vegas) and they soon find themselves taking a detour and stranded.I will not spoil the surprise, but the movie uses several genres to play it out and does so in a way that was both entertaining and very surprising. The movie takes several clichés and mixes them for something new. I recommend the movie.Originally posted to Orion Age (http://www.orionphysics.com/? p=8027).

cambriamoore i thought this movie was REALLY good! it kept me guessing the entire time and i didn't expect the killer to be that person. it was a very entertaining movie that will keep you on the edge of your tail. i suggest you don't eat during this movie is it is easy for you to loose your appetite. i personally really like movies about serial killers and i think this is one of my favorites. i am surprised this movie doesn't have more stars. since you don't know who the killer is it will keep you wondering the entire time and just when you think you know who the killer is you will be proved wrong. i was very close to guessing who the killer was, but it didn't fit correctly at first. there are so many close calls to finding out who the killer was, but right when it was about to be solved the killer changed. there were so many things going on that it was impossible to be bored. when i saw the ending i was shocked and i praised the killer for being so smart. i loved it! i was just looking for an okay movie to watch on Netflix, but i found a movie much better than okay. it was beyond good! i jumped a couple of times as well. i hope you can enjoy this movie as much as i did. if you do love it as much as i did than leave a comment please and give it a good rating!

WhoThrewThatMonkey EvidenceWhat's this Movie About?"Detectives try to solve the murder of a group of people using video footage from multiple recording devices."I really do feel like I wasted an hour and a half of my time.Planning on doing this a little different and not spoiling as much at first. Basic premise is two friends and a boyfriend go on a vacation to Vegas. Along the way, they meet up with a variety of different people and have one more stop before heading out. Too bad their bus gets tangled in barbed wire and they get stranded out in the middle of nowhere.The acting is hit or miss. Sometimes it good but other times it bad, really bad. I'll say that Rachel is very likable at first but when chaos ensues, she becomes a screaming typical horror movie girl. Most of the detective characters act idiotic and rash without thinking. An example is Detective Burquez who rushes to find the suspect without knowing all the facts and then later makes a claim that isn't true and she would know it wasn't if they did a couple more minutes of research. The video evidence guy is completely incompetent and has to allow Detective Reese to do his job for him by clearing up some issues on the footage. Also, the forensics tech who is supposed to examine the bodies but is too busy being fat and lazy...sorry I have little tolerance for incompetence.I have to tell you, this is a found footage movie so right off the bat, most people won't like it. I have been split on found footage movies. I thought Blair Witch was OK, Quarantine is OK, Paranormal Activities were OK, VHS was ... You get the picture. I have never really been against found footage while there have been lots of complaints about the format. This movie is the movie that pushed it overboard. There's just too much jumbled nonsense, extreme close ups and garbled voice acting that I don't think I can defend or appreciate this type of filming again. All of the above is evident in this movie but has an extra kick to it. We are watching a group of detectives watch video footage trying to decipher it because 'the footage was in a fire and was badly damaged'. What they mean is this basic amateurish camera work is shoddy at best and is hard for even detectives to search through. Found footage is not the way I will be enjoying movies going forward. The style just doesn't make sense. Oh, and we get a horrible version of night visions!Now, on to what I did like. The killer in this movie is super unique up until the end. Someone in a welders mask and who uses a blow torch to kill people is pretty cool. Does have a set back though seeing as how the range is very limited due to the hose.The women in this movie are super cute so at least there's something to look at when you can actually see what's going on.There's a scene later in the movie which I don't want to give too much away right now but it involves mutilation and you don't see much but the sound and seeing wriggling feet as chunks of flesh are being tossed to the side is very effective. Wasn't overblown and walked that line of good storytelling and showing just enough.Should you watch this?I wouldn't waste your time. There is only a couple moments of entertainment and enjoyment. I'd say just watch the mutilation scene which in my opinion was the best part but other than that pass.Spoilers and Plot QuestionsOK, so it was all a movie... Kind of. So Rachel calls herself a director and Leann is the actress. Should've seen this coming. They say they can't have the trip without Leanns boyfriend which was kind of weird and should have been a sign. They introduce us to the cast on the bus. Leann and Rachel set this all up and killed everyone so they could make a movie and become famous.So, how did they know who all would be there? How did they know that there would be only that many people and not a bus full of people, some of who could get out of the predicament by simply overpowering them?The detectives act like they didn't know there was a fourth woman on the bus but wouldn't they already know that since the bodies were there? There can only be so many sets of arms and legs even if the bodies were blown apart.Why would they put out the video of them doing that? I'm guessing the answer is to become famous but now the cops know who did it and if caught will go to jail.Detective Reese says that those weren't glitches and the footage wasn't messed up but instead they were edits. I'm not the smartest or know anything about video editing or surveillance recovery but if this wasn't messed up camera footage, would you be able to clear up and decipher frames of footage to see unclear images? Also, even though the video tech guy is an idiot, I would think he would be able to tell the difference between an edit and damaged footage.