Nonureva
Really Surprised!
Baseshment
I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.
Fairaher
The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.
FountainPen
Fails on every point. Just a bunch of juveniles who are deluded into thinking they have some skill and talent and can produce an actual movie, NO!
It is outrageous that such putrid trash should ever make it to DVD. Everything is wrong and BAD about this mess. AVOID IT ! 0/10
whitewiccanwishes
This move has to be the worst I have ever seen. I saw the cover and that it was available on a movie streaming website, and thought to myself 'oooo that looks good'. Well it wasn't. Not even a little bit. In fact, I created this IMDb profile just so I could rate it 1/10. If I could vote it 0/10 then I would. An hour and a bit of my life that I will never get back. I feel sorry for the actors that lent their name to this. It claims to be a horror movie, but is not, the acting is terrible, and the plot is even worse. It is poorly thought out. In theory, it should be a good film, by reading the sypnosis of it, it should be a good film, but it's poorly thought out, poorly executed, and has a poor script to accompany it.
mfrick
I checked the rating before I saw this film. Since, Episode 50 had a low rating I wasn't expecting much. I figured it would be horrible, but it proved me wrong. I really enjoyed the plot of this film, but I think they could have done more with it. One thing I liked was how one group of investigators were there to prove science and the other group were paranormal believers. However, the ending was bad and it should have been approached differently. I think if the budget of the film was bigger than it could have been way better. I rated Episode 50 a 7 out of 10 because I really did like it, and expected it to be over the top and horrible. I would probably watch this film again. Don't let the rating fool you.
omcary
I worked on this "film" There is no way that it was near 1.3 million dollars unless the producers paid themselves 1,270,000. It would be utterly embarrassing if the budget were that high to produce this product, and utterly criminal if they spent this money without paying any of the working crew (the shoot was done by a few very dedicated, very inexperienced interns). And not even pay for the use of camera equipment - one supplied by the unpaid shooter, the other by the unpaid intern. Its half laughable, half disturbing that a production company would advertise a budget on a production to be so much higher than it actually was (maybe $30,000 for production). They should be embarrassed and then audited. And after hanging their heads in shame, should send checks to the people who made it, and then watch a few movies that did in fact cost 1.3 million dollars and see what real film making, and script writing is. Or go to film school.