Glimmerubro It is not deep, but it is fun to watch. It does have a bit more of an edge to it than other similar films.

FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Cristal The movie really just wants to entertain people.

whisperstar I watched this movie a lot as a kid, so I don't think I have it in me to hate it, especially since it's clearly not trying to live up to the original film. But I re-watched it for the first time in years recently, and I have to say, I've never in my life laughed so hard just from watching a film.The story is very simple. Wilbur has gone back to his normal life on the farm alongside Charlotte's three daughters, and he ends up befriending a newborn black sheep after everyone else on the farm mocks him for being different. After the sheep, named Cardigan, is sold to another farmer, Wilbur sets out to visit him and make sure he's doing alright, but ends up being mistaken for a wild pig after a fox makes off with some of the other farm's livestock. Bound by a promise he made to stay with Cardigan until his wool is shorn (yes, that's really why he can't just leave and go back home), Wilbur has to find a way to prove his innocence before the gaggle of angry farmers hunts him down.The relationship between Wilbur and Cardigan is one of the weirdest parts of the film - for starters, Wilbur spends the first twenty minutes teaching Cardigan to act like a pig, and none of the human characters ever take issue with this, even as Cardigan takes part in things like eating Wilbur's pig slop. I get that it's supposed to be heartwarming or something, but why not just have Cardigan act like a normal sheep while still being friends with Wilbur? There are also a lot of times where they cuddle together or nuzzle each other's noses...Rewatching it, I briefly found myself wondering if Cardigan was supposed to be a female. (As far as I know, he's not.)But despite the decrease in quality, the film wasn't all bad. I think the best parts of it were when it focused on Charlotte's daughters. The three of them get a subplot about trying to live up to their mother's legacy, complete with a song number as they try to spell out Wilbur's innocence in their web. Even as an adult, I found them to be pretty endearing as characters and I was sort of invested in their arc, and I wish more of the film's running time had been devoted to them. (Though this investment did make their subplot's payoff a little disappointing for me - without giving too much away, the girls do eventually manage to convey the truth about the situation to the human characters, but a few minutes later, it's revealed that a key piece of evidence was sitting just a few inches away during the entire scene, so the truth probably would've come out whether the spiders had been there or not.)Some minor notes, before I end it off...This film had a lot of songs sprinkled throughout - almost all of them were pretty pointless, but I give them credit that at least the tunes were a little catchy. The voice acting was alright, and there was a surprising amount of intentional humor, despite how inept the film was as a whole. Apart from the three spiders, one other character I was sort of fond of was this sassy cow with a milk problem that Wilbur meets at one point. She didn't need to be in the film at all, but for a side character, she was surprisingly likable and contributed to a good deal of the comedy.All in all, I could summarize this film as what a lot of people see the Disney direct-to-DVD sequels as being like - it's inept and unnecessary, but not without at least a little bit of heart...At the very least, it'll give you some laughs if you choose to sit down for a watch.

cjwhite-31645 I cried when I saw Charlotte's Web on VHS when I was four, When I saw this piece of crap, I cried because of how awful it was. Only three songs are good and worth listening to. Other than that, the film didn't need to happen. The Animation was alright along with some good voice acting. The Trailer was WAY better than the film itself. I have seen this film six times in my childhood, still can't get over how bad it was.

davekeanu Well the first Charlotte's web was a beautiful film it was wonderful masterpiece and rather underrated 70s classic. I remember enjoying it and loving the jokes and the hidden message in that film. When I heard about their was sequel to the first film. I was looking forward to it, I rented it out on DVD at the video store and I thought it was going to be as good as the first. But it sucked it was so boring. And here are the reasons for it what happened to characters like Geoffrey the baby goose and the old sheep and Fern's brother. And what happened to Wilbur every one's favorite pig in the first one he was brave and kind but in this one he is complete loser and scared of every thing the fox as the villain was only likable character in this film. This movie has got nothing to do with the first film what so ever but when it does, it's are total slap stick in the face. This movie is such a let down to the original film and this one is so forgettable the only good thing about this film was the soundtrack 2/10

disdressed12 most kids will probably enjoy this movie,but maybe not as much as the original movie.it' has a pretty negative atmosphere throughout.it is more colourful and action oriented then the first one,as well.the pace is faster and the movie is louder,in general.the first movie is useful for helping children in their spelling and vocabulary.this one really isn't any help in that area.there is a little bit of a lesson on friendship and working together as a team,but not as much as the first one.however,this movie does not deal with any intense issues,such as death,like the first one did.again,there is nothing offensive here,and the movie is appropriate for any age group.overall,though i think this movie is inferior in most respects to the original movie.i'd give Charlotte's Web 2:Wilbur's Great Adventure a 4/10