Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Celia A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

rossovich-51530 *** This review may contain spoilers ***All the time I watched the movie on TV fragments and only recently (can a month ago) I have decided to look since the beginning and up to the end "at assessment" so to speak. and the movie should be told that still a hogwash.we will begin with the fact that show us the certain red unpleasant insurer on a physiognomy who откудато has returned and has gone to insure the car to a mironov at once (it is unclear by the way Why to us further about him show. that even more questions have arisen?) and right there with the God's help defines that that thief. Yes, he for the first time sees the person. doesn't know at all from where he has a car, but draws a conclusion that he is a thief. and of course it is time to manage mob killings. yes the fascist the judge дредд is far more fair than this detochkin.Further show as he with the accomplice hijack the car... and whom was that accomplice? why nobody catches him and about him further nothing is told? what for gang at this detochkin? how does he in general hire people in the sect of fighters?Show as Mironov does to the aunt a margin on a foreign player. and what? so do everywhere and constantly. he doesn't force her to take this player violently? no. and her it isn't vital, can go and try to agree to other seller also as I arranged to him. in what then his crime? about what theft does the father-in-law constantly speak? and for what at the end of a mironov want to put? if on all this there are no answers, then why was in general to him to pay so much attention in the movie?Further. pursuit. why the cop hasn't called the backup on the radio set? I understand that the first years the German tanks perfectly mowed clean t34 Izz of the fact that they had no radio sets and they acted isn't coordinated, but it was necessary to take out from this? for example the fact that the militia has to have radio sets. and if Detochkin delivers him so in the wood and has killed, then and all? end of investigation?OK, all right. Court. for what reason the people in general support a detochkin? therefore чо he transferred money to orphanage? ever nobody robed these people чтоль? untamed all? though it will become easier for somebody if the person who has robbed him tells that he gave everything to orphans? Comparison of a detochkin with Robin a buzzing came across, but Robin stole from feudal lords who couldn't but peel the people, and деточкин robs the first comers because чтото it seems to him...What morals at this movie? what sense? what message? if it seems to you that the person which you meet the thief and you want to achieve justice whether then check him the car you hijack?

Lee Eisenberg "Beregis avtomobilya" in Russian means "look out for the car". It seems that the title actually implies that cars become sort of a metaphor for our lives. The protagonist Detochkin (his surname implies "child" in Russian) is an insurance agent who steals cars from thieves and gives the money to charity. But then there's a surprise.What I mean about the title as a metaphor for our lives. Some people put all their money into their cars; they're complete losers, but at least they have cool cars. Moreover, it's often said that a person is his/her own worst enemy. In this sense, the danger to Detochkin posed by the average vehicle is nothing compared to what his own actions can do.Anyway, this is a pretty funny movie, a look at the Soviet Union in the mid-'60s. We even get to hear an American song in one scene! I suspect that they had fun making the movie. Worth seeing.

Andrei Pavlov By current standards it is really ridiculous to call it a "black comedy". "Death Becomes Her" and "Pulp Fiction" are black comedies. And among the Russian ones "Deja vu" is a good candidate. So, here goes problem number one. Being rather light-hearted it lacks colour badly (suppose they could make it in colour back in 1966). And sometimes it lacks style (the background voice making wise comments in a "TV news" manner is a downer). This is very subjective fault-finding but quite decisive to me. There are no complaints regarding the actors' performance and the story is fine with its "Robin Hood" touch. There are many memorable scenes ("Hamlet" performance, the Soviet shopping, a funny monologue about "our" Shakespeare, etc.) and tons of enjoyable sayings. Most these things are, unfortunately (or fortunately), can be easily understood by older Russian people (especially of older generations) only. As to people from other countries (and even younger Russian audience) – there will be some problems in catching its tune. Just to expand on this matter: for Russians, the movie is one good piece of entertainment, nostalgia, and a historical lesson (clothes, relations between people during the Soviet era, first businessmen a la "spekulianti", Soviet "drama clubs", etc.). For the rest of the world... - hardly. If you live in some sort of USA, was born there, have been living there your whole life, have just watched this movie and ready to give it a 10 right away with a frank heart, post me a few lines please.It is a good movie but not great. Upon the DVD box it is written: "popular videos". It really belongs to that class of movies - "Russian popular videos" that is.If it were in colour and without that bumbling voice behind the camera, the mark from my side would have been better.Quite objectively, it is 6 out of 10 (but there should be a place for this film in the national top 1000 of course). Thanks for attention.

clevelander The absence of reviews here prompts me to say a few words. I saw this in a cinema in Moscow in 1966 [despite date above], a popular film there at the time. I couldn't follow all the dialogue at the time, but I recall being struck by the believability and humanity of the whole thing. Russian public were right on the side of the anti-hero, though he was no swashbuckler and the ending is dispassionate. This was still during the time of the Soviet thaw, and Moscow was heaving with American tourists. Life was better for Russians and things were looking up. The old gallant Soviet war heros had become less interesting, and the time was right for someone more complex, surfacing, perhaps, from the rich literary tradition. A perfect Geroi nasha vremeno - my theory anyway. I'd just like to see it again before giving it a rating!