47 Ronin

1994
6.4| 2h9m| NA| en| More Info
Released: 22 October 1994 Released
Producted By: Toho Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Info

Kon Ichikawa's retelling of the classic true story of Samurai honor. When a young clan lord is forced to commit seppuku (ritual suicide), his loyal followers (now Ronin, masterless Samurai) dedicate their lives to avenging his death.

Genre

Drama, Action

Watch Online

47 Ronin (1994) is currently not available on any services.

Director

Kon Ichikawa

Production Companies

Toho Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.
Watch Now
47 Ronin Videos and Images

47 Ronin Audience Reviews

Matrixston Wow! Such a good movie.
Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
rdoyle29 Kon Ichikawa's adaptation of the extremely popular "Chushingura" is good, but probably not a great intro for western audiences. It very much assumes that the viewer is familiar with the story and starts it in flight with very little explanation. That reservation aside, it's a great adaptation that has many stylistic call backs to chanbara cinema of the 60's without feeling old fashioned.
massaster760 The year is 1701, the setting Japan. In a relatively peaceful time, a reception held for envoys of the emperor, ends in a confrontation between two lords, which in turn would become the catalyst for one of the most famous stories of Japanese history. A story so famous it reaches mythical proportions and is widely regarded as Japan's national legend.The 47 Ronin (1994) is one of the many celluloid re-tellings of this famous story. Directed by master director Kon Ichikawa, 47 Ronin is basically a revamp of late 60's Japanese Samurai Cinema. Considering that Ichikawa made most of his greatest films in this time period (or before), the style of this film is going to be a foregone conclusion for those familiar with the director.As with most films of the genre, 47 Ronin is not an action film, most of the films time is devoted to the character development of Oishi Kuranosuke (expertly played by Ken Takakura), a chamberlain of the Ako-Asano Clan who loses his master to Seppuku. The Asano Lord was forced to commit suicide because of his provoked attack on Lord Kira during the reception for the envoys. In the aftermath, Oishi disbands the clan publicly and at the same time recruits a crew of 47 samurai. They patiently prepare their plans for a year and a half and then storm the fortress of Lord Kira in a mission that-succeed or fail- will ultimately end in their deaths.Kon Ichikawa leisurely unfolds his version of this classic, with beautiful cinematography,intricate set-pieces, and detailed wardrobes. Kon's shots of autumn trees and winter pagodas are breathtaking, and his perfectly framed shots work hand in hand with the highly detailed sets and costumes. Particularly, the Ako-Asano's black and white battle armor is truly fearsome looking.The action is characteristic of 60's Jidai Geki films; opponents square off, one or two strikes are exchanged, the kill shot, and the the obligatory geyser of blood. Although 47 Ronin is a bloody film it's not as bad as some of the more exploitational samurai films of the early 70's (such as the Lone Wolf series). And though the films action sequences are sparse, when they finally happen they are expertly directed and choreographed and are sure to please fans of the genre.Although this is a great film, in terms of plot, cinematography, acting, and action. I have to say that the films slow plotting tends to drag in spots and the films narration tends to get annoying after awhile. Plus the constant jumps in location tend to get a little confusing. I urge anyone interested in this film to read a little of the history behind it, as this will save the viewer from being confused by the story.Bottom Line- 47 Ronin should be seen for Ichikawa's expert direction and cinematography. It does tend to bog down at points but fans of samurai flicks will find delight in this film.
reid-53 This is one of my favorite Japanese movies of all time. The story of the 47 ronin is historical fact. The details around which the film is set are not under dispute. However, what this film is about is not so much the actual revenge of the 47 ronin again Lord Kira; it is rather about one man's resolution to let go of life - and how much he loves his life - to sacrifice it for the call of honor and revenge. The film portrays a sharp dichotomy between the bounds of honor that the main protagonist is trying to uphold and the simple beauty he finds in life. Ultimately, it is a movie about sacrifice, and the bittersweet satisfaction thereof.I would highly recommend anyone interested in seeing this movie first read some historical background on the tale of the 47 ronin. The film operates largely on the assumption that the viewer is familiar with the tale. Knowing the basics will make understanding it much easier.
ETCmodel02 Beautifully shot, wonderful costumes, exceptional poetic imagery and majestic array of classically trained posturing women. However this film is amazingly obtuse, generally slow, incredibly dull minimalist payoff, improbable impregnation, and a couple of instances of Evil Dead style blood spray that seem very out of place. The political intrigue is neat, but that does not justify the pace or the ending, or the fact that many of the seemingly incidental plot spurs remain unresolved. I can appreciate that this is an attempt to recapture the classic style and posturing of the old Japanese & Chinese stage play forms and historical yarns like The Tale of Genji. Unfortunately, while beautiful, the film lacks the depth and loaded nuances of the classic form, and a superficial take on classical theater is far too shallow to really herald as a masterpiece. A good film to watch for visual form, but not a good example of story depth.