Steineded How sad is this?

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Frank The most unfortunate thing about this documentary is the title - most people will skip it because it has a silly title, which it has. However, the documentary makes for interesting viewing about a little known culture that will have disappeared within a generation or two.It is about a little known tribe of nomadic Turkic peoples, the Pamir Kirghiz. Originally they existed in the far North-West mountainous region of what is today Afghanistan, subsisting primarily on their livestock of sheep and yak. The film attempts to tell their story from about the late 19th century up to the present day. How they were forced to move from one region to another due to racial and cultural oppression, especially, and most cruelly, by the Soviets.Admittedly the reenactments are somewhat amateurish, but they also help explain how the Pamir Kirghiz come to be where they are today.This is not a big budget documentary, so don't expect professional narration or a well structured historical time-line. It shows a small slice of the (hard) life of these people, soon to be swallowed up by globalization. It would have been even more interesting if the filmmaker had researched further back into the history of these people, but we must accept his limitations and take what we get. For anyone with an interest in history and vanishing culture, this film is certainly worth watching.

Debra Solomon / culiblog.org As far as I'm concerned, you really can't go wrong with a film about yurts, yogurt, nomadic tribes and the shifting borders of the 'Stans' in Central Asia. I put my pants on one leg at a time.37 Uses, is not so much Hopkins' film but a collaborative work, made with the Pamir Kirghiz tribe, a splendid historical document. The film begins in the 19th c. with the Super Powers divvying up Central Asia, a region that since the inventions of salt, silk, and opium remains one of the hottest properties on earth. We watch as beautiful nostalgic footage is fabricated through the tribe's reenactment, aided by the expert Kirghiz art direction of Muhammet Ekber Kutlu, son of the last Kirghizian khan, Rahman Qul.In case you weren't paying attention during Central Asian History, the Pamir Mountains are the North Westernmost range of the Greater Himalaya, but are the feather in the cap of what is now known as 'the Stans'. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kirghizstan and Kazachstan. Did I forget anyone? It's all about where you think the center of the world is situated, and that is what has been keeping the Kirghizians on the move, beyond their home turf pastures. The Pamir Kirghiz, no strangers to hardship inflicted by Super Powers, have (partially) avoided ethnic cleansing by doing what they do best, being nomadic.

bobgeorge1 This film by Ben Hopkins is a semi documentary about the recent life time history of a nomadic tribe the Pamir Kirghiz. Originally from the Pamir Mountains of Central Asia they were forced to migrate from country to country. The film has the Pamir Kirghiz acting out their own tribal history with humour and diffidence and switches between events in the past and events in the making of the film. The older members of the tribe long to return to the mountains where they had eek-ed out an existence in the border lands between Russia, Afghanistan and China.To survive the oppressions by each totalitarian state they moved from Soviet Union, to Afghanistan, then to Pakistan and finally to Eastern Turkey. In Turkey they have found sanctuary but the cost is to loose their identity. But how does this happen? Go and see the film.You could say, with predictable wit, that there are 37 films one could see any night so why choose this one? Well, it has humour and respect. It mixes its approach as documentary and also story telling and catches also the making of the movie. Cultures are merging and dissolving into some global greyness. Language too seems to moving towards variations on words you can include in English. So how exciting to see the director struggling with 37 sheep words. But I do hope that Ben Hopkins doesn't repeat the theme with a trip to explore the merging worlds of Eskimo peoples ( Inuuit is out of favour isn't it?) because I've yet to see a film from that white out world where subtitles work.

kosmasp I watched this documentary at the International Film Festival in Berlin, where it also won a prize (one of three actually, as can be seen here on IMDb).The title does suggest what this documentary is about, but that's not entirely true. This is about the Pamir Kirghiz people, who have survived many times, by moving. Which makes them practically homeless, one could say. There is not much to spoil here, but I will leave you at that.The director also came out, afterwards and answered a few questions. The humour in the film was clearly coming from him, as everyone could see clearly by his answers that he gave!